• Limitation in view of prayer clause

This matter is from Maharashtra.

Brother of plaintiff herein was Manager of a ancestral properties of Hindu Undivided Family.

Suit of partition in respect of various ancestral properties filed in 2005 by daughter (plaintiff) against her brother and mother (defendants 1 & 2 respectively) for her ⅓ rd share to be separated and for actual possession. 

In said suit a compromise memo was filed by plaintiff and defendants wherein it was agreed that plaintiff will get her share by giving a property suitable to her and Rs. 2.00 lacs will be paid to compensate against less area (being committed area was a small plot) compare to her share. It was also agreed that all remaining properties were kept for defendants viz. Brother and Mother. As per the said Compromise the Decree was drawn and finalized by Trial Court in October 2010.

Defendant No. 1 (brother) did not performed his part till 2014 and after making many follow ups he transferred one plot to plaintiff as decided in decree but did not pay the Amount Rs. 2.00 lacs and also did not entered the Defendant No. 2’s (mother) name at Office of the City Survey Records by deleting his name for or limited to the share of his mother (as already said above he was HUF on the record. Mean time mother was died after 1 year from the date of decree. 

Now Plaintiff has filed recently the decree for execution in Feb 2019 stating therein that Defendant No. 1 (J.D.) did not performed his duty as per decree passed by Trial Court in 2010 and therefore praying that. . . . .

1. To recover the amount which is not paid till this time.
2. To enter the name of Defendant No. 2 (mother) at Office of City Survey Record and as mother is expired therefore her name (D.H.- Plaintiff) to be added as her hair being she is daughter. J.D. Name is already on record hence to add his name do not arise hence that prayer is not made.

Now the Question.

In view of above two prayers, whether my darkhast is within Limitation or Not ?, If Not then what is solution to obtain relief against issues as prayed in above 1 and 2 ?.
Asked 7 years ago in Civil Law

First answer received in 10 minutes.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

14 Answers

Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation for the execution of any decree or order of any Civil Court other than a decree granting a mandatory injunction is 12 years.

 

2) your application for execution for recovery of Rs 2 lakhs is within time 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
99783 Answers
8145 Consultations

on basis of decree you can apply to revenue authorities for mutation of property in your name as legal heir 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
99783 Answers
8145 Consultations

2. Please name of the dead persons can only be entered in the record if there is any court's order, so please file a mutation case to mutate legal heirs either they are dead or alive then it will come that whose name has to be mutated or not.

Koshal Kumar Vatsa
Advocate, Gurgaon
2282 Answers
3 Consultations

Of course and you see your petition has been accepted by the competent court otherwise it has been rejected by the authority at first instance.

Koshal Kumar Vatsa
Advocate, Gurgaon
2282 Answers
3 Consultations

Dear Client,

Limitation for filling execution is 12 years from date of order.

And after mother death, her share will inherit in you and your brother equally. And your second prayer shall not be grant by execution court but by filling separate partition suit. No limitation to file partition suit.

Apply for legal heir certificate of your mother. than on the basis of it, mother property will mutated in you and brother name.

Yogendra Singh Rajawat
Advocate, Jaipur
23081 Answers
31 Consultations

it would not be barred by limitation 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
99783 Answers
8145 Consultations

Trial court decree is of 2010

Execution filed in 2019

Prima facie it would be barred by limitation 

You also have option of filing a contempt petition for disobeying and not performing obligations on part of brother in the decree

As property stood partitioned by decree, your mother 1/3rd share will devolve on you and your brother

So along with your share as per decree, you also have a share in your mother's share

I will check the relevant provision for filing of execution application and limitation for the same and get back

Yusuf Rampurawala
Advocate, Mumbai
7899 Answers
79 Consultations

The limitation period to execute the decree is 12 years from the date of decree. So you are well within limitation.

Ashish Davessar
Advocate, Jaipur
30840 Answers
981 Consultations

Since the decree is in your favour you are free to apply for mutation in the office of tehsildar. That would also be within limitation. 

Ashish Davessar
Advocate, Jaipur
30840 Answers
981 Consultations

  1. As per the information mentioned in the present query, makes it clear that there are two points on which you should get clarity from our Ld, members of this forum.
  2. The limitation period for executing the decree in your favour is 12 years, so your first prayer would surely be within limitation period.
  3. Though you had the option for contempt of court before the Hon’ble High Court for non compliance of the statement in the order against defendant no. 1, which would be less time to conclude in comparison to execution decree.
  4. Then for the second prayer, I would suggest a you to file a different suit for share in your mother share which she got with you long time back, being he legal heir of her in the absence of any Will by her for that property in question.

Rest, you can contact me further for any legal assistance in this issue at any time, if wishes to.

Sanjay Baniwal
Advocate, South Delhi
5477 Answers
13 Consultations

It is well within the limitation period i.e., 12 years for this purpose.

 

You may proceed

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
89985 Answers
2492 Consultations

As far as 2nd question, the plaintiff may submit an application to this effect before the concerned authorities and get the needful done, if the authorities do not entertain then she may file a suit for mandatory injunction agaisnt the authorities concerned and seek direction to the authorities for incorporating her name in the revenue records.

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
89985 Answers
2492 Consultations

The EP has nothing to with the application to be submitted before the city survey office.

You can proceed simultaneously, let the authorities object, you can initiate alternate steps subsequently

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
89985 Answers
2492 Consultations

It's on limitation. You can condone the delay and admit the matter

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
34515 Answers
249 Consultations

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer