• Equal share for daughters in father's property

Has the supreme court ruled a judgement that Hindu married daughters do not have equal share in her father's property?

Thanks
Sachin
Asked 7 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu

2 answers received in 10 minutes.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

14 Answers

There is no such judgement the married daughter have equal share in the property, marriage doesn't.effect her share in parents property.

Shubham Jhajharia
Advocate, Ahmedabad
25513 Answers
179 Consultations

SC has held that daughter has equal share in father ancestral property from her birth . Her marriage is immaterial 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
99960 Answers
8158 Consultations

Hindu married daughters do have equal share in her father's self acquired property 

 

if its an ancestral property then the daughter has a legal share in the joint family property only if her father was living on the date on which the Hindu Succession Amendment Act came into force i.e. 9.9.2005

 

if father was not alive on above date then the daughter, whether married or not, cannot claim coparcenory rights in ancestral property

 

however the daughter can claim right if the property was the self acquired property of the father because a daughter is a class 1 legal heir of a Hindu Male under s.8 of Hindu Succession Act - Schedule 1

Yusuf Rampurawala
Advocate, Mumbai
7920 Answers
79 Consultations

No such ruling, daughter have equal share in father property on his intestate demise.

Yogendra Singh Rajawat
Advocate, Jaipur
23085 Answers
31 Consultations

The married daughter have equal right in the parental property after the advent of amendment in Hindu Succession Act 1956, that came into force since 9th September, 2005.

Mohammed Mujeeb
Advocate, Hyderabad
19369 Answers
32 Consultations

The Married daughter have equal right in the parental property after the advent of amendment in Hindu Succession Act 1956, that came into force since 9th sept 2005. 

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, originally didn't give daughters equal rights to ancestral property. This disparity was removed by an amendment that came into force on September 9, 2005.

Ganesh Kadam
Advocate, Pune
13008 Answers
267 Consultations

Dear Sir,

Till today as far as my knowledge is concerned no such judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar
Advocate, Bangalore
6239 Answers
499 Consultations

That is not right. 

In the alternative judgment has been passed that following certain conditions the daughter will have equal share in the property. 

Regards 

Anilesh Tewari
Advocate, New Delhi
18103 Answers
377 Consultations

No even Hindu married daughter will have the equal right in the property of the father if the property is ancestral in the nature or the Father dies intestate without leaving a will in favour of the children

Vimlesh Prasad Mishra
Advocate, Lucknow
6851 Answers
23 Consultations

There is no judgement as such as a Hindu married daughter has equal rights in her father's property and would be a class 1 legal heirs in case the father dies intestate.

Siddharth Jain
Advocate, New Delhi
6619 Answers
102 Consultations

In father's property all legal heirs have equal right, it doesn't matter son aur daughter or married or unmarried

Supreme court not ruled such judgement that married daughter don't have equal share in father's property

The Married daughter have equal right in the parental property after the advent of amendment in Hindu Succession Act 1956, that came into force since 9th sept 2005. 

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, originally didn't give daughters equal rights to ancestral property. This disparity was removed by an amendment that came into force on September 9, 2005.

Dimple Jain
Advocate, Jodhpur
222 Answers

No no such judgement is delivered. Only a judgement about interpretation of amendment of 2005 of hindu succession Act is dleivered,

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
34646 Answers
249 Consultations

No such judgements come from supreme court so far.

 

The Supreme Court of India has said that women do not have the right to inherit ancestral property if their fathers died before September 9th, 2005. The view of the Supreme Court is that amended provisions of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, do not have retrospective effect. The father would have to be alive on September 09, 2005, if the daughter were to become a co-sharer with her male siblings.

Ajay N S
Advocate, Ernakulam
4125 Answers
114 Consultations

No, it is a wrong notion.

The supreme court has never made any such ruling.

They are applicable only for ancestral nature property

 

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
90159 Answers
2505 Consultations

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer