File an intervention application and get the hearing. The court will allow the intervention if there is sufficient cause to do so
An interim decision by a Nagpur div bench of high court on the ongoing online admissions to FYJC by d education board. It is prejudicial to me in the admission going on in Mumbai. Just a week to go for process to end. What can be done?
File an intervention application and get the hearing. The court will allow the intervention if there is sufficient cause to do so
I guess the interim decision is applicable only to nagpur colleges and it wont affect colleges in mumbai
1. can you elaborate how it is prejudicial to you?
2. you can go for a recall application in the Writ Petition
Generally interim orders are not appealable. An interim order is a temporary order of the court pending a final hearing.
This is my response to you:
1. You can file a application for stay on the interim order;
2. You can become a party to it and get a stay order;
3. Ask the court to take sympathy on you as your student and you will deprived of an important opportunity;
4. In the alternative ask the court to pronounce its order in 2 days itself so that your admissions are not affected;
5. Take legal steps immediately.
d education authority has indulged in severe procedural irregularities.It hasn't bothered to reply despite written queries submitted in person. Plus it's biased against me coz I hv said no 2 Aadhaar.I was preparing 226 wp 2b filed in BOM HC. Any implications as per law 4 me as Nagpur bench turned WP 3932 2 PIL? D petitioners therein aren't parents, r school management s. Fm court order, can c dey haven't provided evidences 2 back their claims.
U want to challenge high court decision or want to file a whole new writ petition? I am not getting exactly what u r trying to ask
You should file intervenor application in Nagpur
2) rely upon correspondence exchanged with authorities to prove procedural irregularities
This is in further response to you:
1. This is the operative part of the order:
We direct the respondents to continue allotment of C.A.P. students to nonminority institutes and after it is
completed, the students if available shall be allotted to minority institutes against such surrendered seats as an interim measure.
2. As per the order it looks like that the admissions will be continued, nonetheless file a intervention application and seek protection against your admission;
3. It does not appear that the order will affect you, but future course of this case may affect you, therefore keep following the case.
1. If the petitioners in the bombay high court wp to be filed before principal bench, are going to be different than the petitioners in the nagpur bench petition, then you can file a petition in Bombay high court, principal bench
2. But do mention about the nagpur bench petition and the interim order passed therein in your principal bench petition or else the opponent may allege suppression of material facts by you
3. What are the irregularities the board has committed?
4. Can u share the nagpur bench interim order
Ask for stay order, if it is PIL, there is high chance that your intervention application will be heard. Ask for interim relief of admission subject to outcome of the petition.
1. If you are aggrieved by the order of the HC then you may file an application to be impleaded as a respondent in it. If stay has been ordered by the HC then an application for vacation of stay may also be filed.
2. Strict evidence is not to be led in a writ petition as it is not a trial.
You can file a petition to implead you as a necessary party to the proceedings by filing the details and documentary evidences supporting your claim along with the implead petition.
If you have already filed a writ petition in Bombay high court, then what is the necessity to get yourself impleaded in this wp also.
Well, there is nothing wrong in getting impleaded in this writ petition also, you may mention that you have already filed a writ before Bombay high court in this regard and can produce the copy of the petition filed before Bombay high court before the Nagpur Bench.