1) make an application for subsituted service ie by paper publicatin in 2 local newspapers if summons could not be served to wife
Hi, I filled section 9 case, court sent normal & registered letter to her parental home & the city where she is working but in first peshi they did not come. My wife told me that postman called her that i sent him court papers what are they? My sasuji also sms me that did i sent letter to her from kutumb nyayalay in which peshi date is mentioned 7 oct 2016 but she can not come due to navratri. But the main problem occurs when i reached court on first peshi date i come to know that in the acknoledge receipt of her parental home letter its return that insuffient address so its return back and in the receipt of letter sent to wife written that door was looked i checked in gov. Speed post site the letter sent to my wife returned to court but court person says they did not got the letter till now also the letter sent to her parental home looks opened & then stapled again. I doubt they provide some money to the local area postman to say that he won't find address although i have sms proof that they know first peshi date. So i want to know what are the other ways i can summon them and got the correct acknowledgement of not receiving letter, what are other legal ways to summon them or prove court they are receiving letter but by bribing money to postman we are not gettting proper acknowledgement receipt.
1) make an application for subsituted service ie by paper publicatin in 2 local newspapers if summons could not be served to wife
Dear Querist approach to court for issue Dasti summon and contact beliff of the court and visit her house along with the beliff and hand over the summon's copy to her and after that Beliff will file his report for the service of summon. if the court is not ready for this then file an application before the court U/o 5 Rule 20 of CPC for publication and after that if she is not willing to appear before the court on date fixed, the court have power to proceed her ex-party. Feel Free to Call
It seems that your wife paid a few hundred rupees to the postman whereupon he wrote ''address insufficient'' on the summons. This is commonly done to avoid summons. Be that as it may, now apply to the court to order publication of summons in a newspaper.
Hi 1) In your case, it is a clear case of tampering of postal cover and it is crystal clear to naked eye that your wife and mother in law have seen the contents of the cover and returned it back to court by managing the postman. 2) To avoid repeat of such instances, you should request the court for substituted service of summons under Order V Rule 20 of CPC. 3) Substituted service of summons include pasting the summons on the Door of the Defendant(your wife) or by releasing advertisements in the newspapers published in the locality where your wife resides. Order V, Rule 20 of Substituted Services of Civil Procedure Code Reads as follows: 20. Substituted services (1) Where the Court is satisfied that there is reason to believe that the defendant is keeping out of the way for the purpose of avoiding service, or that for any other reason the summons cannot be served in the ordinary way, the Court shall order the summons to be served by affixing a copy thereof in some conspicuous place in the Court-house, and also upon some conspicuous part of the house(if any) in which the defendant is known to have last resided or carried on business or personally worked for gain, or in such other manner as the Court thinks fit. 22[(1A) Where the Court acting under sub-rule(1) orders service by an advertisement in a newspaper, the newspaper shall be a daily newspaper circulating in the locality in which the defendant is last known to have actually and voluntarily resided, carried on business or personally worked for gain.] (2) Effect of substituted service-Service substituted by order of the Court shall be as effectual as if it had been made on the defendant personally. Hope this information is useful.
If she is employed and you know her employment or office address, you can request court to serve the summons on her to her office address also simultaneously. The court will accede to your request. This will help you to successfully serve the summons on her. Without proper service of summon you cannot get her served with the summons and the court cannot proceed with exparte orders if the summon are not served on her properly.
Sir i come to know from her side they want settlement money for this although she is employed.she told if i will not will agree to pay she will file maintainence case , litigation case and other false cases. Sir i just want to know we both working in it industry , my net inhand salary is 60k and her in between 30-35 k , she is maintaining nano car she did not purchased but she got this from her brother and now she is maintaining the car and car is on her name. I do not have any asset on my name and currently living on rent with my brother who is working too in my parental home my mother and father lives also my mother father is dependent on me & my brother we take care of their living and medical expenses , my mother is ill currently due to disease me & my brother is taking care of her. As a vehicle i just have two wheeler activa. Since i have some extra financial responsiblity on me due to parents can still she is illigibal for financial support from my side although she is earing well to maintain her and also i come to know in past she travelled in some picnic places in india orgainized by some event group whose charge is around 11k and also to reach the base camp she travelled by aeroplane still spending this much amount can she still force me to pay extra money. What is the chances family court accept her claim and grant her money from me, and what are the things i can do to expose she is earning well spending money in picnic trips enjoying this period and not coming to court to fight her case.
wife is highly qualified , working and earning Rs 35000 per month is not entitled to any maintenance . 2) rely upon judgment of various courts wherein no maintenance has been awarded to working wife .
HE COURT OF MS. MADHU JAIN ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE ROHINI COURT : DELHI M No. 28/07 Sh. Neeraj Aggarwal – Petitioner Vs. Mrs. Veeka Aggarwal – Respondent ORDER 1.. This is an order on application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act filed by the applicant/ wife, respondent in the main case (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) against the non-applicant/ husband, petitioner in the main case (hereinafter referred to as the non-applicant) for grant of maintenance pendentelite and for litigation expenses. 2.. In the application it is stated that the applicant/ wife has no independent source of income and she is not given any kind of maintenance by the non-applicant/ husband to live her life properly and therefore she is facing much hardship in the life. The non-applicant/ husband has flatly refused to maintain her. The non-applicant/ husband is working in a private sector as a Senior Software Engineer HPC in STM Microelectronics Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.1 A, Knowledge Park-2 (near LG Gol Chakkar), Greater Noida and is earning about Rs. 80,000/-pm. He has no other liability and he is not discharging his responsibilities towards the applicant/ wife with ulterior motives to harass and humiliate the applicant/ wife. The applicant/ wife is the legally wedded wife of the non-applicant/ husband and, thus, being a husband, he is bound to maintain the applicant/ wife. The applicant/ wife is fully dependent on the mercy of her parents, who are having other liabilities also and she has no independent source of income to maintain herself. It is, therefore, prayed that the non-applicant/ husband be directed to pay a sum of Rs. 30,000/-pm as maintenance allowance pendentelite to the applicant/ wife and expenses of proceedings. 3.. The application has been contested by the non-applicant/ husband, who in his reply has stated that the applicant/wife is a well qualified graduate Engineer in the field of information Technology and just after the marriage she had joined the service of a private firm and was drawing a handsome salary as initially she was taking Rs. 5000/-pm. Now-a-days she is competent and qualified to earn thousands of rupees per month. She is a qualified trained engineer and she is self stand financially in all respects. The non-applicant/ husband has never neglected or refused to maintain her in any manner and she was duly maintained during her stay in her matrimonial home. The non-applicant/ husband is still ready and willing to provide financial assistance or maintenance if required or needed by her for any purpose in any manner. It is not denied that the non-applicant/ husband is also a qualified engineer and is employed in Greater Noida, U.P. but the actual amount of monthly salary being drawn by him is Rs. 45,000/-pm. It is stated that he has to maintain his retired father and ailing, diabetic mother and old grandmother and also to treat his two married sisters and to look-after his younger unmarried under-education sister of marriageable age as his younger sister is doing B.Ed. from a regular college. He is also paying loan premiums and other household expenses. The applicant/ wife has herself deserted her matrimonial home without any threats or atrocities caused to her by her in-laws and she is not returning to her matrimonial home despite the petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the non-applicant/ husband. It is stated that the non-applicant/ husband is publicly and openly as well as warmly welcoming the applicant/ wife to her matrimonial home but she has started demanding maintenance sitting in her parental home to feed her greedy parents and selfish relatives instead of returning to her matrimonial home and to assist the non-applicant/ husband and her other in-laws in her matrimonial home at the time of need. It is stated that the conduct, attitude and nature of the applicant/ wife is of such type that she is not entitled for any maintenance. Further more, she has also filed a separate petition U/s 125Cr. P.C. for maintenance only with a view to get the non-applicant/ husband harassed in a criminal court. It is stated that the applicant/ wife is not a helpless or poor lady and she is not incapable to maintain herself as she is a well qualified engineer and is already an earning hand. She is handing over all her income to her parents. She does not require any monastery assistance from the non-applicant/ husband as she is already having a good bank balance in State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur at Rohini, Sector-5,Delhi , bearing A/c No. 61005521399 and several other bank accounts also. She also has some immovable properties in her name. It is denied that she requires Rs. 30,000/- as maintenance and other charges as prayed. It is, therefore, prayed that the application be dismissed with heavy cost. 4.. I have heard the Ld. Counsel for both the parties and have carefully perused the record. 5.. During the course of arguments it has not been denied by the Counsel for the applicant/ wife that the applicant/ wife herself is an engineer graduate in the field of Information Technology. Ld. Counsel for the applicant/ wife submitted that the applicant/ wife submitted that the applicant/ wife joined the job for some time after the marriage but thereafter due to the marital disputes she is not in a position to pursue her job and has left the same. In her entire application the applicant/ wife has no where stated that she is also an engineer graduate in the field of Information Technology and that she also joined the job after her marriage. Those seeking justice and equity from the Court must come to the court with clean hands. It seems that for obvious reasons and to extract money the applicant/ wife has not disclosed her true qualifications in the Court. The applicant/ wife is an engineer graduate and, therefore, can very well maintain herself and there is no need for her to depend upon the mercy of her parents or on the non-applicant/ husband. The purpose of Section 24 of H.M. Act is not to extract money from the other party and the court should not be a forum to extract the money or to blackmail the other party. In II (2000) DMC 170 titled as Mamta Jaiswal Vs. Rajesh Jaiswal, the Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed as under:- “Section 24 – Pendente Lite Alimony : Purpose of Enactment : Not meant for supporting idle (Qualified) spouses waiting for ‘Dole’ to be Awarded by her husband – Section 24 has been enacted for purpose of providing monetary assistance to such spouse who is incapable of supporting himself/ herself in spite of sincere efforts – Spouse well qualified to get service immediately with less efforts is not expected to remain idle to squeeze out his/her purse by cut in nature of pendent elite alimony – Wife well qualified woman possessing qualification like M.Sc., M.C. M.Ed – How can such a lady remain without service – lady who is fighting matrimonial petition filed for divorce, cannot be permitted to sit idle and put her burden on husband for demanding – pendente lite alimony from him during pendency of matrimonial petition.” 6.. In I (2001) DMC 19 titled Sangitaben Rasiklal Jaiswal Vs. Sanjay Kumar Ratilal Jaiswal, Mehsana, the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has held that the wife is entitled for Free Legal Aid and therefore, the Court should keep in mind that wife is entitled for free legal services also. 7.. In the present case the applicant/ wife is a well qualified engineer and, therefore, there is no need for her to sit idle at home waiting for the maintenance from the non-applicant/ husband. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case since the applicant/ wife is well qualified and, therefore, can earn handsome amount by working and there is no need for her to be financially dependent upon her parents or on the non-applicant/ husband, she is not entitled for any maintenance. While hearing arguments on the application it was ordered that the maintenance shall be granted to the wife till the disposal of the petition. This sentence in order sheet dated 27.08.2007 only means that the wife is entitled for the maintenance from the date of filing of the application till the disposal of the main petition and not thereafter. It no where reflects that the wife shall be entitled to maintenance I every case come what may. 8.. Therefore, in view of the above said discussion, the application U/s 24 Hindu Marriage Act of the applicant/ wife is dismissed. There shall be no orders as to cost. File be consigned to Record Room. Announced in Open Court Dated : 19.09.2007
n Smt.Mamta Jaiswal vs. Rajesh Jaiswal 2000(3) MPLJ 100, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh while dealing with identical situation observed that well qualified spouses desirous of remaining idle, not making efforts for the purpose of finding out a source of livelihood, have to be discouraged, if the society wants to progress. For better appreciation, relevant paragraphs of the said decision are reproduced hereunder:- "In view of this, the question arises, as to in what way Section 24 of the Act has to be interpreted. Whether a spouse who has capacity of earning but chooses to remain idle, should be permitted to saddle other spouse with his or her expenditure? Whether such spouse should be permitted to get pendent lite alimony at higher rate from other spouse in such condition? According to me, Section 24 has been enacted for the purpose of providing a monetary assistance to such spouse who is incapable of supporting himself or herself inspite of sincere efforts made by him or herself. A spouse who is well qualified to get the service immediately with less efforts is not expected to remain idle to squeeze out, to milk out the other spouse by relieving him of his or her own purse by a cut in the nature of pendent lite alimony. The law does not expect the increasing number of such idle persons who by remaining in the arena of legal battles, try to squeeze out the adversary by implementing the provisions of law suitable to their purpose. In the present case Mamta Jaiswal is a well qualified woman possessing qualification like M.Sc. M.C M.Ed. Till 1994 she was serving in Gulamnabi AzadEducation College. It impliedly means that she was possessing sufficient experience. How such a lady can remain without service? It really put a big question which is to be answered by Mamta Jaiswal with sufficient cogent and believable evidence by proving that in spite of sufficient efforts made by her, she was not able to get service and, therefore, she is unable to support herself. A lady who is fighting matrimonial petition filed for divorce, cannot be permitted to sit idle and to put her burden on the husband for demanding pendente lite alimony from him during pendency of such matrimonial petition. Section 24 is not meant for creating an army of such idle persons who would be sitting idle waiting for a „dole? to be awarded by her husband who has got a grievance against her and who has gone to the Court for seeking a relief against her. The case may be vice versa also. If a husband well qualified, sufficient enough to earn, sit idle and puts his burden on the wife and waits for a ?dole? to be awarded by remaining entangled in litigation. That is also not permissible. The law does not help indolents as well idles so also does not want an army of self made lazy idles. Everyone has to earn for the purpose of maintenance of himself or herself, at least, has to make sincere efforts in that direction. If this criteria is not applied, if this attitude is not adopted, there would be a tendency growing amongst such litigants to prolong such litigation and to milk out the adversary who happens to be a spouse, once dear but far away after an emerging of litigation. If such army is permitted to remain in existence, there would be no sincere efforts of amicable settlements because the lazy spouse would be very happy to fight and frustrate the efforts of amicable settlement because he would be reaping the money in the nature of pendent lite alimony, and would prefer to be happy in remaining idle and not bothering himself or herself for any activity to support and maintain himself or herself. That cannot be treated to be aim, goal of Section 24. It is indirectly against healthiness of the society. It has enacted for needy persons who in spite of sincere efforts and sufficient effort are unable to support and maintain themselves and are required to fight out the litigation jeopardizing their hard earned income by toiling working hours
You should understand the underlying law in her claim for maintenance. She will not be eligible for seeking maintenance is she is employed and drawing handsome salary. You can repudiate her claim by proving her employment before the court and high lighting her salary and other income.with proofs. There are plenty of judgments even by supreme court dismissing the maintenance suit/claim filed by the employed women agaisnt their husbands which you can utilise them during the final arguments of the maintenance case. Let she threaten with any number of cases, do not be scared of them, do not deter your determination to fight back if she comes out with false cases against you.
1. Look these criminal cases are filed either to harass or extort money. If you have not done anything wrong then contest her cases fittingly as and when she files those. 2. To prove her self sufficiency you have to lead evidence of her earnings.