Rajgopalan Sripathi

Rajgopalan Sripathi

Advocate, Hyderabad
1656 Answers
297 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Check-mark-grayLicensed for 24 years
Check-mark-grayFluent in Hindi, English, Telugu, Tamil
Badge-top-lawyer
Badge-top-lawyer
About Advocate Rajgopalan Sripathi
Rajgopalan Sripathi

We are lawyers specializing in Family Law, Property Law, Civil and Criminal Laws, Copyrights and Intellectual property law. Our offices are at Hyderabad, Bangalore, Chennai, Mumbai and Delhi.
Our clients include Small and Medium Enterprises, Multinational Corporations, Start-Up's, Public / Private Sector Undertakings, Family run Businesses, High Net Worth Individuals and Private Clients.

Get legal help now
Practice Areas
Family Law
Marriage, Divorce, Alimony and maintenance, Domestic violence, 498a, Child custody
Criminal Law
Cheque bounce, Fraud/Default, Forgery/Cheating, Bail/Anticipatory Bail, Cybercrime, Trespass, Other criminal matters
Property Law
Rights of sons/daughters/wife, Legal heir, Legal heirship certificate, Buying property, Partition of property, Sale agreement, Sale deed, Gift deed, Deed of family settlement, Succession certificate, Succession of property, Power of attorney, Builder issues, Wills and trusts, SARFAESI action by bank, DRT/DRAT
Civil Law
Consumer forum, Civil disputes, Customs/Excise/FEMA, Banking, Loans, Recovery of money, Summary suit, Insurance, International law
Business Law
Corporate matters, Business contracts, Arbitration, Share transfer, Winding up petitions
Intellectual Property
Trademarks, Copyrights, Patents, Media ownership, Other intellectual property issues
Courts
  • Bombay High Court

  • Delhi High Court

  • Hyderabad High Court

  • Karnataka High Court

  • Madras High Court

  • Supreme Court of India

Recent cases handled
Date
Type of case
Description
Outcome
1 May 2019
Business Law
DRT-Hyderabad- Appeared for borrower. Our argument was that once the borrower has repaid the interest and principal outstanding, the loan can no longer be treated as NPA
Borrower contention upheld. DRT decreed that action under SARFAESI is untenable.
1 May 2019
Family Law
Family court - Hyderabad. Husband had filed for divorce. Husband cited few isolated incidents that happened 3/4 years ago which was contested by the wife (represented by us)
Family court dismissed the petition filed by husband on grounds that isolated events are not cruelty
1 Apr 2019
Business Law
NCLT Hyderabad-.Had appeared for Corporate Debtor and argued that by virtue of scheme of arrangement in Merger, petitioner cannot claim to be a financial creditor
Petition filed by corporate claiming to financial creditor Rejected by Honorable Tribunal.
1 Apr 2019
Intellectual Property
Andhra Pradesh High Court- Trade Mark Infringement in case of a leading cement company. Appeared for complainant.
Honourable High Court Imposed exemplary costs of Rs45 Lakhs for infringing.
1 Apr 2019
Criminal Law
Hyderabad High Court- Appeal against conviction in 304 A case. Argued on the grounds that Ocular evidence cannot be primary and non examination of doctor who did the post mortem is fatal .
Accused acquitted.
1 Apr 2019
Taxation
ITAT-Hyderabad- Argued on behalf of assessee. Assessee was not charging any interest from AE's for providing mobilization advances regarding an EPC contract, adjustment under TP not warranted
Contention of Assessee Upheld.
1 Apr 2019
Civil Law
High Court at AP- Appeared on behalf of a third party in execution proceedings under Order 21 Rule 97. Argued that third party resisting the execution of decree has same rights as decree holder
Appeal filed by Third party allowed.
1 Mar 2019
Business Law
Competition Commission.-Opponent had held that my client had contravened the provisions of Section 3(4)(e) read with Section 3(1) of the Act, 2002
Competition commission dismissed the petition filed by opponent.
1 Mar 2019
Criminal Law
Hyderabad High Court- Setting aside of conviction awarded u/s376 IPC . Argued on behalf of accused and highlighted that prosecution suffers from several infirmities and improbabilities
Accused Acquitted.
1 Mar 2019
Criminal Law
High Court- Bangalore- U/S 302 IPC . Argued for Accused. In absence of evidence with regards to infliction of the fatal injury by the accused, absence of motive, eye witness giving different versions
Conviction quashed.
1 Mar 2019
Property Law
High Court @ Hyderabad-Land Acquisition. Argued on behalf of land owners- High court directed government to pay compensation to land owners.
Land owners awarded compensation under 2013 Act
1 Mar 2019
Civil Law
High Court @Andhra Pradesh- Second appeal- Appeared on behalf of land owner. Opposite side claimed continuous possession of Land and hence adverse possession
High court issued orders in favour of Land Owner.
1 Mar 2019
Family Law
High Court at Hyderabad- Appeared on behalf of the wife. Made arguments that mere fact that the wife is earning Maintenance to Wife can’t be rejected .
High Court accepted our arguments and granted maintenance u/s 125 Cr.P.C
1 Feb 2019
Taxation
ITAT- Mumbai: Argued on behalf of assessee. Booking under-construction flat amounts to ‘construction’ & not ‘purchase’ for Sec. 54 relief .
Contention of Assessee upheld.
1 Feb 2019
Criminal Law
High COURT@ Hyderabad- Bails. Absconding of co-accused not a ground to reject the bail and Investigation against accused completed
Bail granted
1 Feb 2019
Business Law
NCLT - Mumbai- Appeared for borrrower. Bankers filed petition under section 7 of IBC . Our argument was that financial creditor had added the amount that was not due(as entire loan was not recalled)
Petition U/S 7 of IBC was rejected on the above ground amongst other grounds.
1 Feb 2019
Civil Law
High Court at AP- Appeared on behalf of preferential heir(deceased sister's son) opposite side were grand son of uncle of deceased(collateral).Argued that preferential heir are preferred over others.
High Court decreed in favour of preferential heir (deceased sister's son).
1 Feb 2019
Family Law
High Court at Hyderabad- appeared on behalf of the wife. Argued that Payment of maintenance u/s 125 Cr.P.C is a continuous liability which becomes due at the end of every month
High court decreed in favour of wife. Husband has to suffer for each instance of default.
1 Jan 2019
Business Law
NCLT- DELHI- Had appeared for a customer who had paid advance monies for supply of goods. Had argued that advance monies paid falls under scope of financial creditor
NCLT approves the argument that advance monies are a loan. Petition admitted and IRP appointed .
1 Jan 2019
Criminal Law
High Court @ Hyderabad- 138 NI Act.- Once the Accused(Drawer) has altered the date of cheque for validating/revalidating it, he cannot later claim that the cheque became void
Appeared for Drawee. Accused convicted
1 Jan 2019
Business Law
DRT -Hyderabad. Appeared for borrower challenging the 13(2) Notice under SARFAESI on the grounds that the banker had miserably failed to classify the account as NPA prior to issue of Notice
Borrower contention upheld
1 Jan 2019
Civil Law
High Court @ Hyderabad- Suit for specific performance. Appeared on behalf of Purchaser . Issue of notice and filing of suit is ample proof to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform contract
High Court issued order in favour of Purchaser.
1 Jan 2019
Family Law
High Court- Hyderabad. Appeared on behalf of the husband who applied for divorce on grounds of cruelty . Wife appealed against the divorce decree awarded by Family Court.
High court dismissed the appeal.Filing of multiple criminal cases by wife without proof is cruelty.
1 Dec 2018
Business Law
DRT- Appeared for borrower- Our argument was that bank has no right to proceed with recovery proceedings unless they decide on objection/representation of borrower.
Borrower contention Upheld
1 Dec 2018
Business Law
NCLT- Delhi- Appeared on behalf of a Director. Our argument was that Share subscription agreement does not have trappings of a financial loan or financial debt under IBC
Petition filed u/s7 of IBC rejected on the grounds argued by us.
1 Dec 2018
Criminal Law
High court @ Hyderabad- 138 NI Act. Our argument was that proceedings against a person who is responsible for day to day affairs of the company cannot be quashed
Our argument upheld. Quash petition filed by the opponent dismissed.
Rajgopalan Sripathi's recent answers
Map-red-pointer
Office location
Plot 23. Huda Heights. Road number 12,
MLA Colony, Banjara Hills
Hyderabad 500034
Get legal help now
Other lawyers in Hyderabad
Ravinder Pasula
Badge-top-lawyer-small
Advocate, Hyderabad
397 Answers
112 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Anirudh Nellikonda
Advocate, Hyderabad
1 Answer

4.0 on 5.0

Aatipamula Srinivas Netha
Advocate, Hyderabad

Not rated