I have vacated the house on 1st Jan and moved to a new place, now the owner insists that I pay the rent for the period of Jan 1 - Jan 30 also as the notice period is for 2 months.
Is this the practice in Bangalore?
If your house owner issued notice to vacate the house, he should have mentioned the period within which you have to vacate or atleast he should have mentioned in the notice that you have to either remain till the expiration of notice period or to pay the rent if vacating prior to that.
In the absence of any such condition in the notice to vacate the premises, his demand is invalid and illegal.
You can refuse his demand.
Isn't the tenant at a disadvantage here? It is obvious the tenant can't overstay, then why charge the tenant when he vacates early. I understand if a tenant gives a notice and vacates early the owner is at a loss and the tenant is liable to pay in this case, but i don't think it is fair when the owner gives a notice to vacate.
I strongly support your views, you have a valid point to argue and refuse his illegal demand. You re absolutely right that yo never proposed to vacate the house and have done anything breaching the condition of the rent agreement. So you may challenge the landlord properly.
I am little confused when you say the owner is entitled to 2 months rent, does it mean I have to pay him rent for Jan 1- Jan 30 because the notice ends on Jan 29th?
The landlord's demand is unjustified hence you may ask him to proceed legally which can be challenged in the court.