Under Indian law, the distribution of a deceased woman’s property depends primarily on (a) whether she left a will or died intestate, and (b) which personal law applies to her. I’ll address each of your questions clearly and in sequence.
If a Hindu woman dies with a valid will, her property—whether self-acquired or inherited—is distributed strictly according to the terms of the will. The court does not apply the rules of intestate succession at all. She is free to bequeath her self-acquired property to anyone (husband, parents, siblings, relatives, or even non-family members). Legal heirs can challenge the will only on limited grounds such as lack of testamentary capacity, coercion, fraud, or improper execution, not merely because they were excluded.
If a Hindu woman dies intestate (without a will), succession is governed by Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and this is where a distinction is very clearly made between categories of heirs.
For a Hindu woman dying intestate, her property devolves in the following order:
- Firstly, upon her sons and daughters (including children of any predeceased child) and her husband.
- Secondly, if there are no children and no husband, upon the heirs of the husband.
- Thirdly, if there are no heirs of the husband, upon her mother and father.
- Fourthly, upon the heirs of the father.
- Lastly, upon the heirs of the mother.
Now, applying this to your specific situation:
If the woman’s property is self-acquired, and she dies intestate, the law does not treat it differently merely because it is self-acquired. The same hierarchy under Section 15 applies. Courts do not carve out a separate category for “self-acquired property” of a woman in intestate succession the way people often assume.
If both the woman and her husband have died, and they had no children, then the critical question is the order of death:
• If the woman died first, intestate, then her property would ordinarily devolve upon the heirs of her husband (second category), even if the husband himself later died.
• Only if there are no heirs of the husband at all (for example, no parents, siblings, or other heirs as per his personal law), would the woman’s parents inherit.
This position has been repeatedly affirmed by Indian courts, even though it often appears harsh to the woman’s natal family.
Yes, there are many cases where parents of a deceased married woman approached courts claiming rights over her self-acquired property. Courts have consistently held that parents do not get priority merely because the property was self-acquired or because they educated or financially supported the woman. Emotional or financial contribution does not translate into a legal right unless it can be proved that the property was actually held benami for the parents (which has a very high evidentiary threshold and is rarely accepted).
In short:
• Parents do not get a preferential right over the husband’s heirs simply because the woman earned or purchased the property herself.
• Courts apply Section 15 strictly unless a will exists.
Regarding your question on Scheduled Tribe (ST) status, yes, the law can be different.
Section 2(2) of the Hindu Succession Act states that the Act does not automatically apply to members of Scheduled Tribes unless the Central Government has specifically extended it to that tribe by notification. In many cases, customary tribal succession laws continue to govern inheritance.
If the deceased woman belonged to a Scheduled Tribe and the Act has not been extended to her tribe, succession may be governed by customary tribal law, which can differ significantly from the Hindu Succession Act. The fact that the husband was non-Scheduled Tribe does not automatically override this. Courts will look at:
• whether the woman was governed by tribal custom,
• whether the marriage altered her succession law (usually it does not), and
• whether there is proof of a recognised and continuous tribal custom regarding inheritance.
If the Hindu Succession Act has been extended to that Scheduled Tribe, then the normal Section 15 rules will apply despite tribal status.
To summarise clearly:
• A Hindu woman’s self-acquired property is not treated differently from other property for intestate succession.
• If she dies intestate, husband and his heirs get priority over her parents if there are no children.
• Parents have no automatic right merely because they educated or supported her.
• A will completely overrides these rules.
• If the woman belonged to a Scheduled Tribe, customary law may apply, unless the Hindu Succession Act has been extended to that tribe.