Can you refile the contempt petition against RBI?

Yes, since your petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek remedy under law, you can refile it with better legal backing.

Key Points:

1. Refile with additional grounds – You can include new legal precedents like Girish Mittal vs Parvati Sundaram which supports your right to file contempt even if not a party to the original case.

2. Refile with a co-petitioner – If you include someone who was a party to WPC 476/2020, it strengthens the case and directly addresses the court's concern about locus standi.

3. No SLP needed – Since the case wasn’t dismissed on merits, you don’t need a Special Leave Petition to refile.

4. Court can entertain it again – Courts generally allow refiling in such cases, especially when new facts or precedents are presented and the earlier petition was not decided on merits.

Let me know if you'd like help drafting the revised petition or summarizing key judgments.

Firstly before filing the contempt petition agaisnt the RBI, you should have exhausted the remedies before RBI.

if the RBI had dismissed or not entertained your request for exempting the interest against interest during moratorium period despite you providing the sC  precedent directing the bank to not to charge interest on the interest over the borrowed amount for the period during moratorium then you could have approached supreme court with the proposed contempt petition.

Even now you should first exhaust the remedy with the RBI and then file the contempt petition if there is no proper response from RBI

The contempt petition should be filed by petitioner who was party to the original case 

2) you should not file contempt petition as it would not be entertained 

SC judgments have binding value .court ought to have considered the prudente cited by you 

2) if court does not find nay substance in your submissions it can ask you to with draw or impose costs 

Your contention is, submissions in support of you case was not heard by the  Court and now you again want to appear and argue you case. You are not refiling contempt, you are seeking review of earlier order. There is no such refiling of contempt, fresh contempt can be filed if there fresh contempt is committed. Given the  facts—warning of costs—any refiling will be viewed adversely by the  Court.

- If you was not a party in the said Petition then you cannot file a contempt petition as you are not the one who affected by the judgment. 

- However, you can file a Writ petition like PIL if you have affected by the said judgment. 

- The SC can imposed fine , if you will re-file the said petition 

We have advised you to contact petitioner who had filed  earlier petition to take out  contempt of court proceedings 

You can file with co-petitioner as aforesaid 

1. The judgment by SC in this regard is a precedent and can by used as a base in your claim to exempt your case from the penal interest,if the RBI refused to accept your request then you could have filed a writ petition before supreme court for a direction to the RBI to accommodate your request in view of the its own judgment.If you still do not get any relief then you could have filed a contempt of court petition agaisnt the RBI for disobeying the orders of the apex court. 

2. The legal precedents are binding only if you had approached the concerned authorities for the relief based on the court precedent and not without it.

3. Yes, if your case is found not maintainable then court may give you an opportunity to withdraw the case or to face the wrath of court for filing such vexatious and frivolous cass and wasting the court's time and the court may even impose an exemplary penalty for such act. 

Basically you have not approached the supreme court with your problem but you filed a case civil contempt petition without showing thqt you are aggrieved due the bank not entertaining or refusing  your request to grant you the relief  to not to charge you the alleged penal interest.

It was not even a public interest litigation hence the relief sought by you clearly indicates that you were not the aggrieved party neither you projected before the apex court with documentary evidences to prove tht the RBI  did not consider your request despite the ruling of the apex court in this regard. Then also you cannot directly file the contempt petition, you should first seek the intervention of court to direct the concerned authorities to provide you the prelief on merits or as per law, and if the concerned authorities failed to obey the court order, then only yo will be eligible to file a contempt of court petition gaist the concerned authorities for the said reason. 

Well, since the High Court is averse to rely upon this SC decision and you have withdrawn the contempt case as well, then the better option is to file a writ petition and seek necessary direction on your reliefs. 

This would give equal result. 

1. Continuous Contempt?
   Yes, ongoing violation (continued interest-on-interest charges) can be treated as continuous contempt, allowing exemption from limitation under law.

2. Are SC Precedents Binding?
   Yes. Past SC judgments are binding on co-equal and lower benches under Article 141. Courts must consider them unless overruled.

3. Can Court Push for Withdrawal or Costs Quickly?
   While courts may suggest withdrawal/costs, doing so without proper hearing can be questioned—especially if valid precedents exist and were not considered.

Whatever RBI did as alleged, HOW ARE YOU AFFECTED ?

I'm really curious to know 

What's your locus ? 

Are you are borrower who is affected by the alleged actions of RBI ?