Dear Client,
In India, marriages between Sapindas (blood relatives) are generally prohibited under Section 5(v) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 unless custom permits it. If the marriage violates this provision and the partiescontinue to act with family and the community, resulting in embarrassment or distress, aninjunction may be sought on thesegrounds. Courts are not likely to give a blanket restraining order prohibitingthe couple from attending social functions, interacting with family members, or buying property near relatives since these requests may bein contravention of their fundamental rights.
Relief sought: The aggrieved family members can file a civil suit under tort law for causing mental harassment, seeking a restraint from the court onspecific actions directly impactingtheir lives. A restraining order shouldbe confined to conduct that causesserious and tangible harm, such as trespasses on private property or repeated harassment. The court will determine whether the couple's conduct is a concrete legal injury morethan mere embarrassment or community disapproval. Moreover, the suffering of elderly family members can be emphasized to makethe case for a targeted restraining order against unwanted and repeated disturbances.
Mediation or counseling could be considered for better results before litigation because courts prefer an amicable settlement of family disputes. It would be advisable to consult a family law expert who woulddraft the petition with caution,keeping in view the specific circumstances.