You have already filed application in DRAT
you have to wait for disposal of your application before DRAT
bank has to deliver possession of flat to you even if it is sold in as is where is basis
Dear sir, I had bought 1 bhk flat in nagpur for rs.1100000/- under auction from bank of india in june 2018. I have paid full money but after receiving money bank is not taking interest in possession and said that uts your headache we had oroperty as is where basis. I have already filed case being 3rd party in DRAT Mumbai, but there also i am only getting date after date. To purchsee this house, i have taken gold loan of 430000 from this same bank. I am paying rent for current house, as well payung interest on gold loan. Please guide what to do ? Already nearly 2 years have completed but still not getting possession of flat.
First answer received in 10 minutes.
Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.
You have already filed application in DRAT
you have to wait for disposal of your application before DRAT
bank has to deliver possession of flat to you even if it is sold in as is where is basis
Dear sir,
You have not stated as to how and why the DRAT is giving the dates only and why no further proceedings. If you are of the opinion that your benefits are hampered, file the writ in the high court to direct the bank to do the needful,
Without delivery of possession, sale is not complete and as in where in basis is bad excuse.
Better file civil suit in court for recovery of possession or cancellation of sale with refund with interest.
Hello,
Issue- You are a auction purchaser of flat which was not in physical possession of Bank. At this juncture when you claim to bank to get you possession of this asset then bank takes plea that they have sold you this property on as is where is basis.
Law & Statutes - SARFESI Act, 2002 and Security Interest Rules 2002.
Advise - You should initiate talk with bank keeping the proposal that Bank should file an appropiate application u/s 14 of SARFESI Act 2002 before District Magistrate to get the physical possession of the asset. You can propose that you are ready incur the expenses towards the process of filing application and taking possession. There is straight jacket mechanism for the banks to get the physical possession of asset. You should approach bank's legal department and regional/zonal office. You should explain them that there is no legal bar on banks to file these applications after auction sales of these assets. You should involve an expert or consultant so that proceeds can be facilitated between you comfortably.
Notes
Please provide the above details so that query can be resolved more specifically.
you will have to file a suit against the person who has actual possession of this property
the bank always sells property on as is where is basis
the purchaser is required to ascertain the title as well as possession and exercise all due diligence prior to bidding
once the sale certificate is executed by bank in your favour, its role ends
You can seek compensation from consumer court in this circumstances for deficiency of service against bank
Dear Sir,
You have bring pressure on the bank and make negative propaganda see that no body approach that bank. If you do not do like that then your case never taken on broad if taken no effective hearing will be held, if held, no effective and executable order will be passed. The Judges being human beings always take bias side inf avor of the corporate bank. Think wisely and try to teach them a lesson while reaching to your goal.
First inform whether bank issued you the sale certificate for auction sale. It is first requirements for auction sale by bank.
It is assumed that bank issued the sale certificate.
The bank has failed to adhere the requirements of SARFASAI act which make it mandatory to give the vacant possession of the property.
So you can file a writ in HC seeking necessary direction to bank to give the vacant possession of the property, with the help of govt mechinery if required.
It would be the best and speedy process to take the possession.
1. You should file a Writ Petition before the High Court either directing the DRAT to dispose of the case within a fixed time period or direct the Bank to apply before the DM u/s14 of the SARFAESI Act,2002 for taking physical possession of the said property for handing over to you or to refund you the amopunt collected from you by the Bank with interest.
2. This is a common problem faced by the auction purchaser all over India who buys the flats before taking over physical possession of the same by the Banks.
Dear Sir, Please tell / clarify me whether below mentioned order issued by HC, Nagpur Bench, is applicable to be ?? This order dt 26.11.2018 the borrower had got to stop giving physical possession of property. But importantly bank of india had already sold this property by auction in June 2018 and i was successful bidder in the same and later on this order was issued. The order reads as below : "Issue notice to the reapondants for final disposal of the matter returnable on 21.01.2019. There shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause ii. Auction may go on. The possession of the petitioners shall not be disturbed until further orders. The petitioneds to deposit an amt of Rs.11,86,000/- in this court within period of one week from today failing which, the ad-interim order shall stand vacated." Whether this order is applicable to me ?? I m successful bidder and auction purchaser of the property.
Hi
Yes this order is applicable on you also but in this order also it is mentioned that Process of Possession will not be distrubed.
File an application for interim relief in court to take possession instantly. and other matter can be sorted out later.
Thanks
Order passed would be applicable only to the aforesaid case
if it was passed in your case where borrower failed to deposit money then stay has been vacated
Order binding on you but whether have you checked, petitioner submitted the amount? If not than order is vacated and you are entitle to delivery of possession.
Are you party in high court If not than become party in court. Because if petitioner petition allowed than you have to circle bank for refund. Whatever amount deporisted by petitioner, should paid to you if his pettion allowed + interest with bank.
Matter is lock with high court, you can only file recovery suit against bank in civil court.
Also implead as party in high court. Also file application under 226(3) in high court. Otherwise also if ad interim order not extended by court, stay expires after After 12 days .
This fact of the case is not similar with your case.
You can direct approach high court by a writ petition since bank has failed to perform its statutory duties of handing over the vacant possession of the property sold by them.
Other wise you need to move civil court .
Someone had challenged the auction sale
However the court did not stop the auction
While doing so the court kept the possession of the petitioner (who challenged the sale) unaffected subject to the condition that he has to deposit 11.86 lacs in court failing which the protection given to him will not be available
So assuming the petitioner deposited money in court as directed, his possession is protected and that may be the reason why the bank is unable to give you possession
Since the case is pending before court you cannot do anything about it until the same is disposed by DRAT.
Have you given a legal notice to bank so far to handover possession of the property purchased through auction?
If not then you may issue a legal notice at least now, so that let the bank make a commitment through their reply notice.
Did you get a legal opinion before purchasing the property?
How can you buy a property which has not been even taken physical possession by bank?
Also the bank cannot auction sell the property without physical possession, hence it was your fault for not following the procedures at that stage itself hence you are suffering to this extent with monetary losses and mental strain.
The property owner, who is the petitioner in the case filed before high court has got this order in his favor.
This order of injunction is granted to owner to possess the property till the disposal of the case subject to payment of the said amount before court as deposit.
Hence you confirm that if he has deposited the said mount before court or not, it not then you may seek to dismiss the petition filed by the owner.
The order is very much applicable to you also.
Dear sir/madam,
The order cited by you is an interim order and not applicable to your present case. You are suggested to proceed as suggested earlier.
Question - Whether this order is applicable to me ?? I m successful bidder and auction purchaser of the property.
Answer- First of all Let me make it clear that any action taken by bank under SARFESI Act or other act cannot be challenged in writ jurisdiction for the want of alternate remedy u/s 17 of SARFESI ACT and there are number of judgements of Supreme Court and Bombay High Court that high court will no interfere in SARFESI Proceedings. Referring to law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Authorised officer v/s Mathew KC reported in AIR 2018 SC 676.
Please take Note of it whether High Court Case is appeal of order passed by DRAT or it challenges sale certificate or other proceedings of bank then above prepositions not applicable.
Later your refer to ad interim order yes this order is applicable to you subject to deposit of amount as per orders of Hon'BLE High Court. If borrower has not deposited that amount then that interim order is not binding.
It is advised to you that you should file appropriate application be the party of that writ petition also.
1. You should file case for specific performance against bank and its officials.
2. Under specific performance suit you should claim the physical possession of house which bank have to provide to you after successful auction and payment of complete consideration.
3. You should also claim alternate relief of cancellation of Auction and refund of money paid to bank along with interest and compensation for delaying the physical possession.
1. You should tell whether the said order pertains to any the petition filed by the Borrower/Mortgagor of the property you have purchased or not.
2. If it is so, then you can file an intervening application in the said Writ Petition praying for an order directing the Bank to either arrange to handover physical possession of the said property to you within next 30 days or return you the amount paid by you with interest and cost.
3. If the Borrower has not paid Rs.11,86,000/- to the Bank within one week from 26.11.2018, then you can expect the Bank to win the case and handover possession of the property to you.
4. You shall have to find out what was the order passed given by the Court when the matter was heard on 21.01.2019.
5. Contact the Bank to get the information or get the order copy from the website of the High Court.