What is the meaning of this order dated: 27/05/2019 212 CRM-M-[deleted] HARI HAR PARSAD SHARMA AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA Present:- None. **** In the interest of justice, adjourned to 17.09.2019. (FATEH DEEP SINGH) May 27, 2019 JUDGE We were expecting the grant of bail on this day as all the evidence was in our favor. This case is being pending since 18 DEC 2018 and on last hearing another date is given. My laywer said, a private lawyer from girl side has filed a wakalat nama on this date and aksed the court to grant some time for filing reply on the evidence which we have submitted. In the previous date there was DAG who was arguing on this case from state of haryana side but now a private lawyer will represent state of haryana? is it possible? please advise to get out of this situation.
First answer received in 10 minutes.
Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.
1) court had granted an adjournment
2) basically when you file for Anticipatory bail your wife can take out a application that no AB be granted without considering her objections
3) her lawyer will oppose grant of AB
4) Govt lawyer will advance his arguments and court will pass orders after hearing both parties
The private party who has lodged the fir will contest the case. Although this order means that nobody was present from your side.
Regards
No private lawyer will.represent the complainant side not the state. And as per order your advocate was not present in the court.
The matter is adjourned since your side advocate was not present.
The matter is adjourned means you got next date in the same. No private lawyer can only assist state lawyer she can't independently proceed with the case
Dear Querist
the complainant may also engaged her lawyer for fighting the matter before the court and that lawyer may argue the matter before the High Court after permission of the Govt. Advocate.
the private lawyer can not represent the govt. but may only assist the public prosecutor/DAG/Govt. Counsel
Feel Free to Call
Your advocate is lying to you as no appearances were recorded.
Private lawyer cannot represent the state of haryana, but private lawyer can represent defacto complainant.
Why this order saying Present: None,is it typing error or my advocate is not present there?
Your Advocate wasnt present.
None means your lawyer was not present.
And instead of dismissing the anticipatory bail application the court adjourned the matter.
It appears your lawyer was not present in court on said date
can we change the lawyer at this stage of case and how will affect my case?
Yes you can change the lawyer and it will not affect your case as your case is based upon the facts and circumstances and hence engage a good lawyer who can argue and is present every time case is listed.
Regards
Yes. You can change your lawyer. Changing your lawyer would not have any adverse effects on your case.
You are at liberty to change your lawyer
it would not affect your case adversely
As per order your advocate is not there.
See this won't effect the case you can engage an advocate taking NOC from current advocate.
Present none can be parties not present. If lawyer is present it's marked in roznama. Change of lawyer is a personal decision depending on your faith in him
Private lawyer will not represent state of Haryana, he will be representing the girl side alone.
In fact on the last hearing date there was no one present before court hence the honorable court has adjourned the case to some other date.
Your bail application matter will be heard on 17.9.2019 after they file their side counter to the objections they have raised to your bail application.
The order is very clear that there was no representation from any side hence it was mentioned that none was present. You may ask you lawyer that whether he was present or not before the court on that particular date of hearing.
You can very well change th3e lawyer even at this stage, it may not affect your cse just because you have changed the lawyer but it may make a difference if the newly appointed lawyer may not be very effective and skilful as the previous lawyer.
Hello,
A private lawyer will just represent the complainant and not the state
you may ask some other advocate to cross check the file.
regards
There might be a technical error (none present) and might be that the lawyer is lying.
As advise ask some other advocate to peruse the file.
regards
yes you can change the advocate at this stage also.
regards
Dear client
Yes this is possible as lawyers are there to represent the party if they want them to appear before court and a private lawyer can join the hearing at any stage of case from either side.
And DAG will be assited by that lawyer in further hearing in High Court.
Present None can be possible as a new lawyer from complainant side has filed the Vakalatnama and requested for adjournment of case for that day.
You can change the lawyer at any stage of the case but that can effect you if new lawyer is less experienced than previous lawyer.
