Interim maintenance on the grounds of disparity of income
Dear All,
My wife earns (take home) 40,000 salary v/s mine as 1,20,000 per month.
When there is disparity in income of husband and wife, court orders husband to give a cut of 1/3rd of his salary to wife as interim maintenance, to bring both parties on the same pedestal. I have heard that this is a directive from Supreme Court. Does any one have more information on this directive and tricks / tips on how to win against it?
This is an additional provision which judges use, to support women when husband proves that wife is working and able to sustain herself. Need advice on how to win this situation proactively.
1. If I ask the wife to bear my 12 year old daughter's all current (school, transport, etc) and future (higher education / marriage) expenses in ratio of our take home salaries AND
2. (I ask my wife to list down all the expenses which she has to bear (today); to live with the same dignity and comfort which she was living at the time of filing the divorce suit) + (her court expenses) = Total expense required by her every month - Subtract from it the amount which she herself can bear reasonably to survive, and then finally contribute to the balance amount : Would it be granted / supported by the court and will this help me to avoid the disparity of income / one third salary cut provision ?
Asked 5 years ago in Family Law
Religion: Hindu
Thank you Ajay Sir. May I ask you how you estimated 10,000 approx maintenance ? Is it by applying disparity rule ? or perhaps 1/3rd rule ? or something else ? I am mainly keen on avoiding / winning this disparity of income gimmick, somehow.
Asked 5 years ago