1) If grant order is of 1962 Mr M G could not have sold the land in 1961
2) Mr G did not have have right, tile , interest in said land
3) if original sale itself was illegal subsequent purchasers did not have any title to the property
Looking to buy an apartment built on a land whose title flow is as below: -Mohammed Gudu sold land to Gurreddy in 1961 -Grandson of Gurreddy sold it to Darshanlal in 1985 -Darshnlal converted it to non agricultural land and sold it to Pavan Kumar in 2003 -Pavan Kumar sold it to my builder in 2015 I came across a doc which appears to be an order by Deputy Commissioner for inam abolitions against petition filed by Md Gudu seeking occupancy rights on the land (case filed in 60-61) and hes has been registered under Sec 5 of Mysore personal and misc inam act 1954 as a permanent tenant with premium Along with it a receipt of premium of Rs 350 My worry is that this grant order is dated in 1962 whereas Md Gudu sold it in 1961 only. Will there be any problem due to this?
First answer received in 30 minutes.
Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.
1) If grant order is of 1962 Mr M G could not have sold the land in 1961
2) Mr G did not have have right, tile , interest in said land
3) if original sale itself was illegal subsequent purchasers did not have any title to the property
1. Mr. Gurreddy shall be eligible for rights on the property under " Feeding the Estoppel ".
2. Even though the grant order is in 1962 and Mr. Mohamed Gurdu sold the land in 1961 itself to Mr. Gurreddy, the latter will be treated as the owner of the property.
3. However, get the property papers verified by a Lawyer to be doubly sure..
Heirs can claim right over a property within specified time, Time limit prescribed to institute a suit is 12 years.
Thanks for the answers. Mr Sethi and Mr Sastry answers are contradictory so I am still confused. I got the property documents like sale deeds, RTCs, property tax receipts, Khata certificates, EC etc verified from a lawyer and he seems to be fine with them. I only have this doubt about the validity of the first sale deed itself. Also is there any time restriction on selling such a land which has been granted?
the Mysore Religious and Charitable Inams Abolition Act, 1955 came into force with effect from 1-4-1959. Under the provisions of the said Act all the lands which had constituted religious Inams in the State stood vested in the State Government.
. Section 4 of the Act provided for conferment of occupancy rights on certain categories of tenants called Kadim tenants. Section 5 of the Act made provision for grant of occupancy rights in respect of permanent tenants.
3) if your lawyer is satisfied with title deeds and has given it in writing thst time is clear and marketable then you have to decide
Dear Sir,
Each property has its own merits and demerits. But your your property has no such serious lacunas as it is converted land. Each property has its own risks to some extent. Without looking into document no concrete opinion can be given. It is not known whether there was any condition as to not to sold for a certain period.
Hi, all you need to take care of is wether the layout plan and development plan of the building has been sanctioned by the town and country planning .. If the licence has been obtained from the relevant authorites then you can proceed ahead
Section 5 of inam abolition act is the proper provision in this regard and the Dy. commissioner passed an order invoking the said provisions of law, hence this should not be a problem however your question is abut the date which is subsequent to the date of selling.
In fact the property was subsequently underwent plenty of transactions and this was not objected to by any purchaser so far.
Also it is not known what was the order and what was the basis for such order, hence you may either obtain a legal opinion about this from a local lawyer by producing all the relevant papers before him or ignore this issue and proceed.
I got the property documents like sale deeds, RTCs, property tax receipts, Khata certificates, EC etc verified from a lawyer and he seems to be fine with them.
I only have this doubt about the validity of the first sale deed itself. Also is there any time restriction on selling such a land which has been granted?
The first sale deed was not disputed by anyone so far including the legal heirs of first vendor and it is more than 12 years hence even if there is somebody to object this, it is barred by limitation.