The offences under section 66c and 66d IT act are not compoundable in nature though a quashing petition in high court can be filed and on ground of settlement it may be quashed

Yes can be compounded with consent of other party.

Apex court held that Offence under Section 420 of the IPC are compoundable with the permission of the court by the person who is cheated.

Section 500 of IPC is compoundable offence and can be disposed of by Lok adalat on basis of compromise arrived at between parties

offences punishable under Sections 66- C & 66- D of Information Technology Act are not compoundable,

Hence cannot be disposed of by Lok adalat

You can file for quashing in HC u der section 482 of cr pc

In your case some sections are not compoundable . 66c and 66d IT act are not compoundable, Section 500 of IPC is compoundable offense, personation 419 and cheating 420 are not compoundable but can be consider in certain circumstances with the permission of court.

1. The offences under Section 66C and 66D of IT Act are non-compoundable, hence the only remedy is to file a petition for quashing in the High Court on the basis of compromise.

2. 419, 420 and 500 IPC are compoundable even before Lok Adalat even before charge is framed

But it be compound on the request of complainant only.

Nature of Cases to be Referred to Lok Adalat

1. Any case pending before any court.

2. Any dispute which has not been brought before any court and is likely to be filed before the court.

Provided that any matter relating to an offence not compoundable under the law shall not be settled in Lok Adalat.

Offences under section 66c and 66d of IT Act are non compoundable and quashing petition needs to be filed under section 482 of CrPC in High Court in order to get the criminal proceedings quashed.

Section 500 IPC is compoundable where is Section 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code can be compounded but only with the permission of the court.

Sec. 420 – compoundable – Apex court held that Offence under Section 420 of the IPC is compoundable with the permission of the court by the person who is cheated.

And yes offence under 500 is also compoundable.

Section 66c and d of which act are you referring to?

Regards

This is my response to you:

1. Yes section 419, 420 and 500 can be compounded provided that the litigant who has filed the case is ready to compromise;

2. So if you wish, make a lawyer appear before the lok adalat and wrap it up;

3. Try to finish it pre-litigation otherwise the costs you would have to bear would be large;

4. You will have to state more facts of the case and then best legal opinion can be given;

5. Consult a local lawyer and take steps.

Only those Criminal cases which are compoundable as per law.

Sec 419 not compoundable. and by HC only.

Is 66c 66d compoundable in Lok adalat in pre litigation stage of a case?

There is no particular reference to lok adalat in this situation.

Under some criminal provisions if any section of the Penal Code is also read with the same wrong act the offence becomes non compoundable and is to be quashed only by the HC under Sec. 482 provisions

Is 419, 420, 500 compoundable in Lok adalat in a pre litigation stage?

Section 500 of IPC is compoundable offense, 419 and cheating 420 are not compoundable but can be consider in certain circumstances with the permission of court.

Sec. 420 – compoundable – Apex court held that Offence under Section 420 of the IPC is compoundable with the permission of the court by the person who is cheated. Since the parties are related to each other and they have decided to accord a quietus to their disputes and live peacefully, we permit them to compound the offence. Hence, the offence under Section 420 of the IPC for which the appellant was convicted is compounded because it is compoundable with the permission of the court.

Legal Provisions of Section 419 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Punishment for cheating by personation: ... It says that whoever cheats by personation shall be punished with simple or rigorous imprisonment for a term extending up to three years, or with fine, or with both.

It is compoundable by the person who was cheated.