the fact that signature has been done on AD is proof of service
.court will condone delay and take written statement on record . at most you can insist on payment of costs .
Opponent submitted reply after 3 1/2 years
"Consumer forum case" Summon signed on registered acknowledgement, but no company rubber stamp. Letter of Department of post say's document delivered to opponent. But opponent say's, document not received and so why he has submitted reply after more then 3 1/2 years. Please let me know High court / supreme court / National forum judgement & your valued advice
Asked 11 years ago in Civil Law
Ask a question and receive multiple answers in one hour.
Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.
4 Answers
"Consumer forum case" Summon signed on registered acknowledgement, but no company rubber stamp. Letter of Department of post say's document delivered to opponent. But opponent say's, document not received and so why he has submitted reply after more then 3 1/2 years. Please let me know High court / supreme court / National forum judgement & your valued advice
Asked 11 years ago
If the reply has been submitted after 3.5 years then it bears testimony to the fact that the summons were served. Why do you even need any judgment on this?
ideally his defence should have been stucked off and forum should have proceeded exparte uptill now.any way now you can press for exparte decree
Agree with Ajay Sethi.
