• Chargesheeted & bailed under IPC 420,406 and now facing NIA 138

Lawyer Sir,

I'm out on bail granted from supreme court and trial is ongoing for the charges framed against me under IPC 420,406.
I've taken 10,00,000 rupees from mother of Ramesh through account transfer and have given two blank dated cheques of 5,00,000/- each to Ramesh (Account Payee) in year 2013.

Due to big financial loss, I couldn't pay the 10L to Ramesh's mother hence she filed a F.I.R and put me in Jail ,where in F.I.R she didnot mentioned anything about these blank dated cheques given by me to her son Ramesh as a security.

Now when I'm out on bail and trial is on-going, I've received a notice under N.I.A from Ramesh for these cheques which were bounced due to "Insufficient Fund" in my account.

Kindly help:

1] Please tell me how to handle both the cases parallely as both are related to the same issue? Can i request court to see both the cases as one and not different cases or remove IPC 420, 406 from me and pursue the case under NIA Sec. 138 only? 

2] Ramesh has manually put dates seems to be from different INK, can i accuse him of false activity done by him or he has misused my cheques and file complaint against him based on Forensic investigation of these cheques?

3] How can i use this NIA case against me in best possible manner to get out of this mess (420,406) filed by Ramesh mother and live my life freely?

4] What if Ramesh says that Dates are also put by me in the cheque but there is no mention of these cheques in FIR under which my trial is ongoing, how to beat him and her mother in both the cases?

Thank you for your help.

Please share some thoughts which can ease my life, I'm going through hell....
Asked 6 years ago in Criminal Law
Religion: Hindu

Ask a question and receive multiple answers in one hour.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

8 Answers

1. Since two offences are committed out of the same incident you are liable for prosecution for the both the offences.

2.Since you gave the cheque for repayment purposes only he has done no wrong by putting the dates .

3. The NIA case has no relevant with the cheating case and you can not use one agaisnt the other.

4.The FIR need to mention the cheques as FIR is related to non payment of money giving rise t cheating.There is no defect in the FIR.

Prepare for defence unless you can settle with ramesh out of court amicably.

Devajyoti Barman
Advocate, Kolkata
22815 Answers
488 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

1) both are separate cases and court would not drop charges against you under section 406, 420 of IPC

2) when you issue blank cheque you authorise drawer to fill in the details

3) it is in your interest to arrive at an amicable settlement with the complainant

4) if complainant says you have put in dates apply to court for forensic examination of the 2 cheques

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
94693 Answers
7527 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Both are different cases, hence maintainable because cause of action and relief sought are different.

Filling up the cheque is permitted by the provisions of NI act.

You can claim non maintainability on the grounds of double jeopardy.

You can even file a discharge petition or quash petition.

If the cheque was blank in the criminal complaint then you have won both the cases, discuss with your Advocate thoroughly.

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
84893 Answers
2190 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

1. You can not be tried for the same offence twice as per the right enshrined in Article 20(2) of the Constitution of India, and therefore you can ask the court concerned to try you under the same offence in one court of law. Though 138 are different proceedings but still you can try and take this defense.

2. That can not be done, a person has right to fill even a blank cheque if you have signed it and have given it to the concerned person.

3. Probably you can not get out of the trial that is being carried on right now under section 420 and 406.

4. That is a matter of trial and lot depends on the person who is handling your case.

Regards

Anilesh Tewari
Advocate, New Delhi
18078 Answers
377 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Sir,

Your present lawyer should have told you to go for quash of the case filed u/s 420,406 .But NIA would continue till judgement given Or any settlement arrives among parties.

You can file criminal case against ramesh u/s 192,196,470,463 of IPC for writing the dates on the cheques. Forensic team would need to verify the hand written content on the cheque.

You can get back to me for more advice.

Thanks,

adv.niranjan,

mobile - .

Niranjan
Advocate, Bangalore
844 Answers
9 Consultations

4.9 on 5.0

The court might also pass ex parte order, if you are in the knowledge of summon then I advise you to put in appearance.

Regards

Anilesh Tewari
Advocate, New Delhi
18078 Answers
377 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

1)unless summons are served trial would not commence

2) it is better you accept the summons and file detailed reply in application made by wife under section 125 cr pc

3) if inspite of service of summons you dont attend court exparte orders would be passed against you

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
94693 Answers
7527 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

1. A separate case under Section 138 of NI Act cannot be filed when there is a trial in progress under sections 420 and 406 IPC with respect to the same transaction. Be that as it may, it depends on the complaint under 138 NI Act. Nothing can be said without a threadbare perusal of the complaint.

2. You can file an application for sending the cheques to FSL. No counter case can be filed unless the court acquits/discharges you.

3. Contest the cases on merits.

Ashish Davessar
Advocate, Jaipur
30763 Answers
972 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer