Forgery will of grandmother's property

Grandmother Laxmi passed away peacefully in her sleep, leaving behind a legacy of love and a tangible reminder of her existence – the family home. However, the inheritance of this cherished property ignited a bitter dispute between her two grandchildren, Arjun and Vishwa. Arjun, the elder grandson, claimed sole ownership of the house, citing a handwritten will allegedly penned by Grandmother Laxmi herself. The will, dated a few months before her passing, clearly stated that Arjun was to be the sole inheritor of the property. However, the authenticity of the will was brought into question by Vishwa, the younger granddaughter. Vishwa maintained that the will was a forgery, made by Arjun to seize control of the house. She argued that Grandmother Laxmi had always held the belief in equal inheritance and would never have favoured one grandchild over the other. To support her claim, Vishwa presented a series of witness testimonies from neighbours and extended family members, all of whom attested to Grandmother Laxmi's unwavering belief in fairness and equity. As the dispute escalated, both Arjun and Vishwa sought legal counsel. Arjun's lawyers argued that the handwritten will served as irrefutable evidence of Grandmother Laxmi's intentions, emphasizing the legal sanctity of the document. They further contended that Vishwa's accusations of forgery were baseless and lacked any substantial proof. Vishwa's legal team, on the other hand, challenged the validity of the will, pointing out inconsistencies in the handwriting and questioning the circumstances under which the document was supposedly created. They also emphasized the testimonies of the witnesses, showing the consensus of Grandmother Laxmi's belief in equal inheritance. The case took a dramatic turn when a hidden shelf was discovered in an old almirah in the house. Inside, a sealed envelope containing a second will was found. This will, dated several years prior to the one presented by Arjun, clearly stated that the house was to be divided equally between Arjun and Vishwa. The discovery of the second will threw the case into disarray, raising questions about the authenticity of the first will and the true intentions of Grandmother Laxmi. The opposing legal teams scrambled to analyze the new evidence and formulate their arguments accordingly. The court proceedings were intense, with each side presenting their arguments with unwavering conviction. Arjun's lawyers argued that the first will, being the most recent, nullified the second will, while Vishwa’s team argued that the second will reflected Grandmother Laxmi's true intentions, considering it was not a handwritten one and was executed when she was in full possession of her mental faculties.