498a fir quashing with compromise

I have reached a compromise with my wife, agreeing to settle for a sum of 20 lakhs. Initially, I disbursed 10 lakhs during the first motion of the Section 13B application, and subsequently, she withdrew the Section 125 and DV Act 12 cases. To address the FIR under Section 498 A, 323, and 406, I approached the High Court in Chandigarh with a Section 13B compromise statement, seeking the quashing of the FIR under Section 482 CrPc. The court has directed the trial court to record the statements of both my wife and the Investigating Officer. Now, my wife has expressed her intention to provide her statement on the same day, with her advocate suggesting that the second motion of the Section 13B application can be executed promptly, followed by a request for the remaining 10 lakhs. My concern lies in the sequence of events after her statements are recorded in the trial court. The pending matters include the Investigating Officer's statement and the quashing of the FIR from the High Court. I am uncertain whether to release the remaining amount on the same day or insist on first quashing the FIR from the High Court before executing the second motion of Section 13B. Her advocate has assured that recording her statements in the trial court would not pose any issues in quashing the FIR. However, I am apprehensive about the possibility of her retracting her statement once she receives the full amount and potentially withdrawing her support. I seek guidance on whether I should insist on quashing the FIR from the High Court before completing the financial transaction, considering the potential risks involved.