Consodaltion

Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 14020 of 2016 Petitioner :- Anwar Ali And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. By means of this writ petition the petitioners have raised a grievance that pursuant to a sale deed executed in their favour on 21.8.1989 and subsequent sale deeds, the petitioners applied for mutation in the revenue records under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. Since Section 4 notification under the Act, 1953 was issued in the year 1981 by order dated 31.1.1992 and by subsequent orders the name of the petitioners has been recorded in the revenue records during the consolidation proceedings. It is submitted that against the aforesaid orders neither any appeal nor any revision was filed and, therefore, these orders attained finality. It is further submitted that Section 6 (1) notification under the Act, 1953 has now been issued in 2013 and by virtue of Section 6(2) of the Act, 1953 the mutation in respect of the petitioners upon the sale deeds attained finality. It is submitted that by the impugned order dated 15.1.2016 ignoring the order passed by the consolidation authority under Section 12 in favour of the petitioners with regard to mutation of their names in the revenue records contrary order has been passed without any notice to the petitioners. Matter requires consideration. Learned Standing Counsel represents respondent nos. 1 to 3. Issue notice to the respondent no.4 for which steps be taken within a week. Respondents may file counter affidavit within one month. List thereafter. Till the next date of listing, parties shall maintain status quo with regard to the entries made in the revenue records. Order Date :- 30.3.2016-SB