Can Bank sale/auction property on which interim temporary injunction of a Civil court

I am Landowner rajesh A. Matter from Solapur maharashtra. A land owner, B is intended buyer plaintiff in civil suit , C is Bank, D is the Sale Certificate holder of suit property from Bank in Auction. 1) A is Land owner purchased property in 2008. , has temporary lay out of 2002 valid for 1 year i,e, 2002-2003. from Municipal Corporation Solapur. 2) A owner executed unregd aggreement to sale of Rs 25 lakhs , with plaintiff B in 2009 & received isara rs 5 lakhs. 3) in year 2010 , A took loan from Co-op.Bank C by Regd mortgage rs 1.4 cr. 4.) Plaintiff B filed Spl. Civil Suit under specific relief to get sale deed from land owner A. 5) Civil court granted interim injunction in favour off plaintiff and ordered defendantS not to create any third party interest in property till disposal of suit in 5.7.2012. 6) The lending bank C gave application on 7.7.2012 to Civil court to join in the said suit of Plaintiff B. Court ordered and allowed the bank C to join in Suit as defendant. 7) Thus joining to the suit , the TI order is also applicable to this Bank C . 8) Now after joining to this Suit , the Bank started actions against Land owner / borrower A under SARFEASI Act in year 2013. Land owner A filed application SA in DRT Pune against Bank C, not to sale it for lower price than Reserve price. The SA is pending in DRT till 2015. here my question is , whether the SARFEASI act can be applicable or come into play for such already litigated property and having TI of civil court not to create 3rd party interest till disposal of suit? which is ordered well before, and the bank started its action u/s Sarfeasi after this stay order of Civil Court? 9) Auction called for entire land area say 100 sq mtrs at Reserve price 120000/-. The auction purchaser D paid Rs 35000/- which is under reserve price and took only 15 plots (about 50 % land ) in auction. 10) The land owner A gave conditional consent to bank C for finalizing the auction and to sale these plots to auction purchaser D, putting condition that , "this consent is is on the basis that bank should complete the formalities and sale certificate adhering to law and the necessary legal procedure." 11) But Bank did not followed the legal procedure that bank failed to vacate the Temporary Injunction from Civil Court , and without taking permission from Civil Court , as well as during pendency of matter in DRT Pune, without informing to DRT , this Bank C executed sale certificate in the name of auction purchaser D. 12) my question is the bank overruled the Civil court TI order, also in pendency of SA application in DRT pune, and also sold alleged plots in accordance with bank C , but the layout permission was temporary and its valid period is only for 1 year means it is forced till 2003. thus at the time of sale in 2013 , the plots are legally not existing after 10 years of layout period. 13) Now the auction purchaser party D , so motto joined in our Civil Court matter of Plaintiff B .