Need Advice on court judgement

My grandfather had 6 children [4 sons –A, B, C & D and 2 daughters ‘E’ and ‘F’] A, B & C - Defendants and D is the ‘Plantiff’ , ‘E’ and ‘F’ have not contested and have no objection] • In 1984 my grandfather sold his ancestral property and purchased a House from that money and the extra money equally contributed by his 3 sons (A,B&C) • ‘D’ also got some money from the proceeds of sale of ancestral property and he bought his own • house elsewhere • The house bought by grandfather was later transferred through his registry to A,B& C (Defendants) • Post grandfather's death no separate will was written by my grandmother Post grandmother's death ‘D’ filed a suit against my father & 2 uncles(defendants) against the below given points 1. The Plantiff is entitled to a preliminary decree of partition with respect to the said ‘Property’ 2. The Plantiff is entitled to a decree of possession with respect to his share in the said ‘Property’ 3. The Plantiff is entitled to a final decree of partition with respect to the said ‘Property’ As per court’s judgement “All the specific points 1 to 3 have been decided against the 'Plantiff' However the court has also observed that all legal heirs of my grandmother will get an equal share in her property since she did not write a separate will post my grandfather's death (her legal heirs include 'D' as well _______________________________________________________________________________ Basis these I have few specific questions i. Is ‘D’ still entitled entitled to 1/6th share from this property ii. Can A,B & C sell this house without taking D’s consent