High Court confirmed 1/4th share - can Supreme Court direct me to go for settlement?

My father had 4 sons and 4 daughters. Will was registered .Fathers self acquired property to be divided equally among 4 brothers. No share to sisters. I entered into an agreement of release and endorsed receipt of 80% consideration amount.With the anticipation of balance amount, return of jewels I signed original document and agreed to put for Pending Registration but the same was returned to me for non submission of ITC which was agreed to submit ITC by OP.No evidence produced for return of jewels. 2 opportunities were given to OP to finish the transaction but the same result came. As per the document which was kept as pending with registrar office there is a record so that I received entire consideration amount but it is not true. Since OP failed to keep their promises as agreed the release deed was returned to me with the knowledge of all brothers.After issuing a legal notice and waited till 6 years and thereafter I filed partition suit in district court which was decided unfavour to me but I made appeal with high court and it was decided in my favour. Now the aggrieved party filed SLP in Supreme Court and attained a Status Quo order and moved for settlement.My question is whether Supreme Court can insist me to go for settlement even though I am not ready to agree for it. Please advise me what will happen if I do not agree for settlement and whether my share will be confirmed as decided in high court?