Apartment Building dispute becomes criminal case. PLEASE HELP !!!

SITUATION: Mrs. Seema Devi lives in an apartment and there were 4 small shops in the basement of the apartment building. The shops were purchased by people (3 brothers – Brother 1 living just in front of Seema Devi’s flat, while Brother2 and Brother 3 had actually purchased the shops from the builder while residing abroad). Now Brother 1 on the behest of Brother 2 and Brother 3, started demolishing original partition wall of the shops and went on rampage and forcibly closed of common passageway of the apartment building and forcibly constructed another shop and expanded all the existing shops. Seema Devi protested their illegal construction and destruction activities and she filed a case under section Cr P C 133 – removal of obstruction from common passageway – in the city’s SDO court against Brothers 1, 2 and 3. Somehow, town’s Municipal Corporation also filed a vigilance case against Brother 1 detailing what illegal modifications he had done. As a result Brother 1 started becoming aggressive towards her and her family members. Brother 2 also came back from abroad and both brothers started harassing her and her family members while the case was still pending in SDO court. On one day using building guard’s help, both of the brothers somehow managed to call Seema Devi’s bahu ( daughter in law ) and son ( who is currently residing with his old parents in the same flat ) downstairs in parking lot --- both brothers and their wives viciously beat her son, daughter in law and herself as well when she came hearing all the fighting downstairs in parking lot. When her son phoned police, both brothers filed a false case of which the details are as follows : Case #1 -- Criminal brothers case against Seema Devi, her daughter in law, and son : The case had been filed by Brother #2 pregnant wife alleging that she is 4 months pregnant and falsely stating that Seema Devi’s son had barged into her flat upstairs kicking on her pregnant belly and dragging her downstairs indecently where Seema Devi’s son also allegedly beat up Brother 1 and Brother 2 – everything a big lie and a concocted story. Case 2: Seema Devi also filed a case against them with what happened truthfully. As a result IPC sections 504, 506, 354 were put against Seema Devi , her son, and her daughter in law, even though the wife of Brother #2 had said entirely a fabricated story. And as a result of complaint by Seema Devi, IPC sections 504, 506, 379 were put against both brothers and their wives. For both cases 1 and 2, respective parties have been granted bail by lower court. Now my questions are as follows : (1) What should Seema Devi do – should she knock the doors of High court for quashing the fabricated allegations by Brother #2 wife against the backdrop of Seema Devi’s SDO court case ? If yes, what are the chances of getting their false case quashed by the High court ? (2) City SP while doing supervision had removed IPC sections 506 and 354 against Seema Devi, her daughter-in-law and son because of lack of evidences that the whole fight had taken downstairs in the parking lot and not upstairs in those brother’s flat as falsely alleged by Brother # 2 wife. Will this stick in the court – removal of these 2 sections-- or will they still be considered by the court for trial ? (3) Please advise what additional steps should Seema Devi take to safeguard her, her son and her daughter in law interests ? Thank you !