Who decides on the criminality and take cognisanse??

Sir, I have run from pillar to post for para 1, viz,, the western union, DO Post, DOE and the police for the fraudulent documents for necessary action but of no avail. I had filed a complaint with the Gurgaon police as well through the COP window about para 1 & 2 . The IO has cited that the case is pending in court and has closed the case and therefore did not carry out the investigation. Following was the complaint made to the COP, Gurgaon. "This is to inform that a civil suit for partition is pending in court of law in Gurugram for 2&1/2 storey house of C 1805, Sushant Lok I. The property is registered in the name of three brothers and their mother who is now a deceased person (DOD 08/08/2009). There is also a probate appeal in a different court in Gurugram. In the former case "decreed with costs" on the defendants has been imposed. 1. The persons named above at 1 & 2 are my brothers and No. 3 is brother in law of No. 2 and has the power of attorney delegated to him. These persons are defendants in suit for partition. They have submitted some fraudulent documents pertaining to money transaction alleged to have been made to me between the period 12 March, 2009 and 31 July, 2009 through Western Union amounting to Rs. 5 lakh. It was a surprise element for me to have seen these documents as I have never ever transacted with western union. I therefore approached Western Union through emails and even corresponded with High Commissioner of Australia. The response from Western Union was not encouraging citing policies and that information can be revealed to the investigating agency. (The necessary documents as spoken are at “Annexure – 2” numbering 24 in all) 2. While the evidence was being collected under the evidence act, some glaring falsification was found in the form of forgery. Wherein it was observed that my late mother had signed a document in English as late as 14 Jun, 2010. My signatures and Shri Yogender Singh Rawat’s signature were also forged by Shri Madan Singh Rawat while applying for a DHVBN power. (“Annexure – 3” numbering 18 in all ) There is clear evidence to show that these three have conspired along with other unknowns to show transactions that have never occurred. Madan Singh Rawat can go to any extent to meet his end is clearly visible that a son makes his late mother alive. It is therefore requested that a thorough investigation may please be carried out into the respective complaints as these are more directed at the authorities to mislead them. I am for sure these are all indicative of their personality and may be involved in many other nefarious activities detrimental to the society at large. Necessary registration of FIR is solicited under the provision of law at the earliest please." As there being no window for attachments, I can email them if one wishes to see them. Can these perpetrators of fraud be booked ever or are being encouraged by the law? The Honorable Senior Civil Judge was made aware of these facts. Does it mean that constitution encourages victimization? Thank you.