Reg: 101 maintenance case filed by society

Sir or Madam My parents have been fighting a case against the society since last 20 year. The case is currently in High court and has been pending for final hearing from last 5 years. High court has ordered the Society to submit a fresh account with regards to maintenance and other dues as per the By-laws. But Society has failed to do so in spite of several reminders for last 5 years and just want to drag the case purposely. My parents can no longer fight this case due to old age and now I want to know what are my legal option available. Can I file a criminal or contempt of High Court Order case in order to expedite proceeding. Below is the judgement of High Court as I am unable to attach the file. I would greatly appreciate your feedback on the further course of action against Society. Thanks Bhupendra Kumar bkkumar9638@gmailcom Bombay High Court ash 1 wp-6880.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6880 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Amol D. Joshi for the Petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 4TH OCTOBER, 2011 P.C.: There was a recovery certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 in favour of the Petitioner against the first Respondent for recovery of certain amount. By the impugned judgment and order passed by the Revisional Authority, the recovery certificate has been set aside. Instead of ordering restitution of the amount recovered under the recovery certificate by the impugned order, the Divisional Joint Registrar has permitted the Petitioner to adjust the amount received by the Petitioner towards the amount payable by the first Respondent to the Petitioner Society. ::: Downloaded on - 24/08/2016 19:31:38 ::: Bombay High Court ash 2 wp-6880.10 2. The Petition has been admitted for final hearing. Prayer for staying the clause (3) of the operative part of the impugned judgment and order cannot be granted for the simple reason that after setting aside the recovery certificate, instead of ordering the restitution, the Petitioner has been granted facility of adjusting the amount received by the Petitioner Society under the recovery certificate towards the other dues payable by the first Respondent. It is obvious that the adjustment will be subject to final outcome of the Petition. 3. Subject to what is observed above, no case is made out for grant of interim relief. Adinterim relief stands vacated. (A.S.OKA, J)