Should I be the third party in bank's ongoing case?
Hello Sir..! My name is Surinder. I am a bid purchaser of a residential property which is symbolic. In That property the defaulter has shown a tenant...made a rent deed 6 years back.. And said to his fake tenant to put a case against him that he is trying to get me off this house forcely. There was no litigation on the bank.
I have paid 25% Amt and trying to arrange the 75% Amt through loan from the same bank but from other branch. While the loan process has been started.. The bank started making legal search report. They ask me to take N.O.C approval from GLADA (puda) to sell as the property is under GLADA. But the concerned branch has not taken any approval. Though concerned branch's Advocate said there is no need to take that approval as it is not required he can give this thing in writing. But the GLADA authorities says that bank can not mortgage any property of GLADA without their approval. He cannot even Auction the property with out their consent. They said in their paper the defaulter is the owner of that property.
Any ways I have continued the loan process. Now the concerned branch's Advocate called me and advised me to put a case for having stay to deposit the rest of the 75% amt till the case has not been settled with the defaulter as I can get the possession then after only and make a Fd of 25% Amt which I have paid and the Interest should be given. Advocate advised me to be the third party in their ongoing case as the defaulter has made a litigation against the bank that bank can not Auction his property. This auction was not valid.
Kindly suggest me I m very confused. If I put a case I can not show me as bonafide bidder.
Please help
Asked 7 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu