• Execution of award

An arbitration award went in favour of a Company "A' represented by its Proprietor
Can this award be enforced if the Company has closed without assigning its right to any one.
I made the payment by a cheque in favour of company. But the court is insisting on making payment to the Proprietor in his personal name.
Under what sections of law, can this be challenged. Any rulings of any court?
Asked 10 months ago in Civil Law from Bangalore, Karnataka
The direction of the court is not in accordance with the law. When there is no assignment made in favour of the proprietor by the company the cheque cannot be drawn in his favour. Challenge the order in the higher court. 
Ashish Davessar
Advocate, Jaipur
18063 Answers
446 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
1) it is a sole proprietorship concern . 

2)the arbitration proceedings must have been filed by A sole proprietor of the concern 

3)  a limited company is a separate distinct legal entity but that is not the case with sole proprietorship concern 

4) court is absolutely correct in directing you to make payment to sole proprietor on his personal name if  his proprietorship concern has closed down
Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
23123 Answers
1214 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
There seems to be something amiss. There can't be a proprietor of a company. A company is managed by directors. It appears that you are talking about a proprietorship firm. 
A proprietorship firm is not a separate entity and proprietor and his firm are one and the same thing. Therefore an award in favour of proprietorship firm is as good as that in favour of proprietor. Even if a proprietorship firm .is closed the proprietor remains liable for its activities. In view of above discussion  if your answer to my query in the beginning is yes ie it is a proprietorship firm and not a company then on a proof that the person is proprietor of the firm, the benefit of award can be assigned to him.
H. S. Thukral
Advocate, New Delhi
514 Answers
125 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
Hi
"A " Represented by its proprietor means it is a proprietor ship firm not a company in its legal meaning.

1. It seems the opposite party is a proprietorship firm run by a sole proprietor. 
                   It cannot be a company when represented by propritor.The proprietor represented the firm and if  he has filed it the award will be in his name .

2. It means the concern business firm in the arbitration proceedings  was  not a registered company under companies act, it is a proprietorship firm. The award will be in the name of the applicant in this case the proprietor.

3. if the company/firm was running on single proprietorship and he was representing it in the court the award will be  in his name. Hence the execution of the award, the payment should be made to him. 

4.  Hence the Court is right in directing to pay the proprietor.
Thresiamma G. Mathew
Advocate, Mumbai
1316 Answers
85 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
In an arbitration award, if the award is clear that the company contested the case and the proprietor has nothing to do with the award because the award was in favor of company, then the executing court may not pressurise the judgment debtor to make payment in favor of the proprietor until there is a petition seeking permission of the court to direct the respondent to make the payment in his favor citing the substantial and convincing reasons for asking so.
T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
13934 Answers
127 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from top-rated lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
Ask a Lawyer

Civil Lawyers

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
13934 Answers
127 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
23123 Answers
1214 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
Ashish Davessar
Advocate, Jaipur
18063 Answers
446 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
Krishna Kishore Ganguly
Advocate, Kolkata
12043 Answers
228 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
Nadeem Qureshi
Advocate, New Delhi
3522 Answers
129 Consultations
4.9 on 5.0
Rajgopalan Sripathi
Advocate, Hyderabad
869 Answers
43 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
Atulay Nehra
Advocate, Noida
427 Answers
15 Consultations
4.7 on 5.0
Ajay N S
Advocate, Ernakulam
1905 Answers
19 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0
Shivendra Pratap Singh
Advocate, Lucknow
2729 Answers
41 Consultations
4.9 on 5.0
Thresiamma G. Mathew
Advocate, Mumbai
1316 Answers
85 Consultations
5.0 on 5.0