From the wording of the DV order, the case is finally disposed of. “MC is allowed on the basis of the compromise agreement” and “nature of disposal: uncontested – disposed” means the court has accepted the settlement and closed the proceedings. The case cannot be reopened merely by filing or not filing a memo. Reopening is possible only by a fresh proceeding or by challenging the order before a higher court, which is extremely unlikely once compromise is acted upon.
The attachment mentioned in the order continues only “as per the terms and on compliance of the respective terms.” This means the attachment is not permanent; it is conditional. Importantly, the attachment is only in respect of the property that was specifically attached by the court earlier. A DV court does not automatically or independently attach a bank locker unless there was a specific interim order freezing the locker. If there was a separate interim order regarding the locker, that order stands merged into the final order and continues only until compliance. If there was no independent locker-freeze order, then the attachment language applies only to the immovable property already attached.
Your approach is correct and legally sound: you should insist that the petitioner files the memo for lifting the attachment simultaneously with, or immediately after, the gold is handed over from the joint locker as per the compromise. The wording of the order clearly places the obligation on the petitioner to file the memo after compliance. She cannot demand further conditions at that stage, because the court has already recorded the settlement and disposed of the case.
In practice, once the petitioner files the memo stating that the settlement terms have been complied with, the court will pass a short consequential order recording compliance and lifting the attachment. In many courts this happens on the same day or the next working day. There is no requirement of fresh consent from you at that stage, because the compromise has already been accepted and forms part of the final order. The case status will remain “disposed”; it will not revert to “pending” or “reopened.” What you may see is an additional order uploaded as a “compliance / memo order,” not a revival of the case.
There is no fresh “final order” in the DV case beyond what you have quoted. The quoted order is the final order. The memo and any order lifting attachment are consequential directions flowing from the same final order.
As a precaution, before going to the bank locker, ensure the following are in place: a certified copy of the DV final order, the compromise agreement as filed in court, and a written undertaking or acknowledgement format ready for signature immediately after the gold is handed over. Once the gold is taken, the acknowledgement should be signed then and there, and a copy kept ready so that the petitioner’s lawyer can file the memo without delay.
If, despite the compromise and final order, the petitioner attempts to obtain any independent order to operate the locker unilaterally or tries to reopen issues, that would amount to violation of a court-recorded settlement. Your remedy in such a situation would be to bring the violation to the notice of the same court by way of a compliance / clarification application or, in extreme cases, contempt. However, given the present status, such misuse is unlikely once the case is shown as disposed and the compromise has judicial backing.
Regarding the divorce, since the Mubarat / OP (MMA) is shown as “disposed” and “uncontested – allowed,” the divorce has been granted. Once a matrimonial case is disposed in this manner, the status will not change unless one party files an appeal or review within the statutory limitation period. Until then, the online status remains valid. The delay you are experiencing is only in obtaining the certified copy of the decree, not in the grant of divorce itself.
There is no second consent session in Mubarat once it is allowed uncontested and disposed. Statements are typically recorded on the day of filing or hearing, and once the court allows the petition, the matter is concluded. What remains is only administrative issuance of the certified decree copy.
You should apply for certified copies of both the DV final order and the divorce decree. Keep them safely, as they are your conclusive proof that the disputes stand resolved.
In summary, both cases are finally disposed. Attachments continue only conditionally and only until compliance. Filing of the memo is a procedural follow-up, not a reopening. The case status will not revert or change adversely unless challenged in appeal. As long as you strictly follow the settlement sequence—gold handover, acknowledgement, memo for lifting attachment—you are on legally safe ground.