ex gratia payments, which are additional payments made without legal obligation, are generally not taxable.
2) ex-gratia payment constitutes a capital receipt, thus not taxable under section 17(3).
My husband was paid ex gratia payment last year...though he lost his job in restructuring, he was made to resign...the full and final settlement letter says clearly that in addition to other amounts the company is paying an ADDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY EX GRATIA PAYMENT...Also in the schedule attached to this letter, they have divided the payments into two parts...first part says statutory and contractual entitlements which includes unpaid salary for the month and leave encashment...the second part says non statutory payments...it includes ex gratia payment and pro rata bonus....the rule for the bonus eligibility in the company is that the employee should be on the pay roll till 30th october..our employment ended on 12.08.24 and we were still paid pro rata bonus...now I want to understand if these ex gratia payment can be treated as capital receipt in my hand...TDS has been deducted in form 16 on the same..but at the same time form 12 BA is blank..no amount is mentioned there...please help...thanks
ex gratia payments, which are additional payments made without legal obligation, are generally not taxable.
2) ex-gratia payment constitutes a capital receipt, thus not taxable under section 17(3).
Ex gratia payment in employment context is generally treated as taxable salary income, not capital receipt, even if called “discretionary.”
Since it was part of the F&F settlement and TDS was deducted in Form 16, it will be assessed under the head “Income from Salary.”
The fact that Form 12BA is blank only means it wasn’t treated as a perquisite; it does not change taxability.
Pro-rata bonus is also taxable salary, even if company policy conditions weren’t met but still paid.
But a similar question here by someone else was answered saying that its a capital receipt and many cases were quoted...in that case too, ex gratia payment was mentioned as a voluntary and discretionary payment and was advised to claim refund from the income tax department even uf shown and taken in form 16
Your case is an additional discretionary ex gratia payment.
These payments come under the employment contract. However, an ex gratia payment is an extra payment made by the employer, and such an amount without any legal obligation is not taxable. In other words, Ex gratia payments are not taxable in India, unless they are made in lieu of salary or wages. But it will be taxable as salary income under Section 17(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 if paid in lieu of salary on losing the job. This is because ex-gratia payments made by employers to employees in connection with termination of employment are treated as "profits in lieu of salary" and are subject to regular income tax rates.
Of course non statutory pro rata bonus do not come under taxable income.
You may file your ITR accordingly and claim refund of aTDS made by the employer for the reasons and citations you rely upon.
Ex gratia paid on job loss is normally taxable as salary (Sec 17(3)), which is why TDS was deducted and shown in Form 16. Courts have in some cases treated such payments as capital (non-taxable) if they are purely voluntary and not linked to services, but since your employer has classified and taxed it as salary, safest is to show it as salary in ITR.
an ex gratia payment is an extra payment made by the employer, and such an amount without any legal obligation is not taxable. In other words, Ex gratia payments are not taxable in India, unless they are made in lieu of salary or wages.
Ex-gratia payment made voluntarily by an employer is taxable under Section 17 (3) and held in CIT v. Jamini Mohan.
. Judicial Precedents Supporting Capital Receipt Treatment: CIT v. Jamini Mohan Kar (1989) 176 ITR 127 (Cal): Payment was ex-gratia, totally voluntary, and not compensation implying obligation to pay Arunbhai R. Naik v. ITO (2015) 379 ITR 511 (Guj): Ex-gratia amount without employer obligation is not taxable as profits in lieu of salary Recent ITAT Ahmedabad ruling (2025): Severance compensation for employment loss is capital receipt, not profits in lieu of salary What about these cases?? They were quoted here on this platform only supporting ex gratia payment as a capital receipt
If it was declared as capital receipt then why would your employer deduct tax at source for the payment made to you.
You may ascertain the details in further through your auditor and proceed as advised.
ex gratia payments, which are additional payments made without legal obligation, are generally not taxable. This means that ex gratia payments aren't considered taxable income unless they're given in place of regular salary or wages.
In your husband’s case, the company paid a discretionary, voluntary ex gratia payment along with statutory dues and a pro rata bonus, with TDS deducted but Form 12BA left blank. You are specifically asking whether such ex gratia payments can be treated as a capital receipt—thus not taxable—and referring to judicial precedents that have supported the non-taxability of similar ex gratia severance payments.
The taxability depends on whether the payment constitutes “profits in lieu of salary” under Section 17(3) of the Income Tax Act or is a purely voluntary, discretionary payment without any contractual or statutory obligation. Several judicial rulings—including ITAT Ahmedabad (2025), Arunbhai R. Naik v. ITO, CIT v. Jamini Mohan Kar, and others—have held that truly voluntary and discretionary ex gratia payments made without any employer obligation, and not as compensation for service or termination, may be classified as capital receipts and not taxable as salary income. If the employer had no legal or contractual requirement to pay this amount and did so unconditionally and voluntarily, the amount does not fall within the purview of Section 17(3).
However, tax authorities and some recent industry practice generally treat severance-related ex gratia payments as “profits in lieu of salary” and thus taxable at the employee’s applicable slab rate, imposing TDS at source. The position is more nuanced if the payment is not linked to employment, service, or contractual settlements but is truly ex gratia and not compensation for loss of employment or in connection with termination.
Given that the payment is mentioned specifically as “discretionary ex gratia” and there are precedents supporting capital receipt treatment, you may claim a refund for the TDS deduction by reporting the amount as exempt/capital receipt in your tax return and citing relevant case law. Be prepared to defend the position if the tax department seeks clarification. The absence of reporting in Form 12BA further corroborates its non-contractual nature.
In summary, if the payment is purely voluntary with no employer obligation, you can argue—with judicial backing—that it is a capital receipt and claim a refund for any TDS deducted. If the department raises queries, rely on cited case law and correspondence from the employer.
For help in drafting your reply, supporting claims, or preparing your tax return accurately, please reach out for further consultation.
Thanks to each and every one of you for your response. It is 3 in favour of capital receipt and 3 against it. I m still unclear. I want to tell here again that its not a small amount. Abd when there is a chance to save taxes, why not? I am a CA and would not like my client to leave any chance to save tax!!! I m not practicing so not well versed with the systems which are there today. If I dont treat ex gratia as a capital receipt, tax will be a whooping 15 lakhs vs taking it as a capital receipt will result in a refund of 6 lakhs!!! How should I leave this?? Pl help with the procedure as to how things will go ahead if I take it as a capital receipt as to a intimation, appeal, tribunal etc. And how and where to show this amount in my income tax return...hope to get some answers which will help me take a firm decision...thanks again for all the help
It’s not a taxable income if not given as salary if it’s given as salary then it will be taxable and will be under the head of receipts
With ₹15 lakh tax vs ₹6 lakh refund at stake, take the aggressive capital receipt approach:
Show under "Income from Other Sources" with NIL taxable value - not salary head
Attach Form 16 but include explanation claiming capital receipt treatment
File claiming refund based on strong legal precedents
CIT v. Jamini Mohan Kar (1989) - Voluntary ex gratia not taxable
Arunbhai R. Naik v. ITO (2015) - No obligation = capital receipt
Recent ITAT Ahmedabad (2025) - Severance compensation is capital
Intimation query → Reply with legal grounds
Assessment scrutiny → CIT(A) appeal with precedents
ITAT appeal if needed → Recent favorable rulings
Refund timeline: 6-24 months post successful appeal
Settlement letter says "additional discretionary" payment, voluntary without legal obligation, capital compensation for employment loss.
Bottom Line: Strong legal precedents justify the risk for ₹21 lakh differential. File aggressively with proper documentation.