1. Resolution dated 6.12.2021, which is antedated and finds no place on the MCA portal:
As per Section 117 of the Companies Act, 2013, filing of resolutions on MCA portal is mandatory. Though, it is not a criminal offence and only penalty can be imposed.
But in the above scenario, all resolutions were uploaded except the one dated 6.12.2021 and was used to submit evidence of revocation of POA of the client.
If it can be proved that the resolution was not uploaded as a part of the larger conspiracy to violate the rights of the client, following sections can be applied:
• Section 447, Companies Act- Fraud
• Section 229, Companies Act
• Relevant Sections of BNS related to forgery such as Sections 336-338 etc.
2. Removal as Director:
You were removed as a Director and the filing on MCA portal shows that all 12 members were present at AGM. As the client was also a member and not in the country on the date of the resolution, then following remedies can be applied:
• Criminal case for Forgery (Sections 336-338 BNS)
• Criminal Breach of Trust (Section 314 BNS)
• Fabricating False Evidence (Section 229 BNS)
3. Complaint to MCA for SFIO under Section 229 and Section 447
If it can be proved that the Board Resolution was antedated, signature was forged and revocation of POA & removal as a Director was a part of criminal conspiracy against the client:
• Section 229: Tampering with evidence—Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine up to Rs. 10 Lakh.
• Section 447: Punishment for Fraud
Summary:
• Remedies under BNS,2023
Criminal Complaint under relevant sections of Forgery, Fraud, Criminal Breach of Trust, Giving False evidence in Court, Criminal Conspiracy.
• Complaint to MCA
o Complaint for Failure to upload resolution on MCA portal
o Request for investigation of Serious Fraud under Section 447 and Section 229
• NCLT Remedies
o Forensic examination of signature
o Setting aside illegal/forged resolutions
o Reinstatement as Director