1) the Karnataka High Court had held that daughters would be entitled to equal share even if father had died prior to September 9, 2005, when litigations over partition were pending in courts.
2) The text of the 2005 amendment, the apex court said, itself clearly provides that the right conferred on a ‘daughter of a coparcener’ is ‘on and from the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.”
3) All that is required is that daughter should be alive and her father should also be alive on the date of amendment,” the apex court said.
4) the judgement of SC is not applicable to your case as property is not ancestral
5) it is your own case that property is self acquired of your father
6) on your father demise you have one fifth share in property . daughters can file suit for partition to claim share in property