Property schedules and TDS
I am in the process of acquiring an empty plot of land, specifically site number 257, in Bangalore. However, there is an issue concerning the Property schedules. The neighbouring site, site number 256, is currently the subject of a dispute between the landlord and the allottee, and the matter is being heard in the Karnataka High Court. If the court ruling favors the landlord, the property schedules will be altered, and site number 256 will be assigned a different number.
The society responsible for the layout has indicated their willingness to provide a rectification deed in the event that the disputed site is awarded to the landlord. In light of these circumstances, I am considering whether or not to proceed with the purchase of this site. However, I am concerned about potential issues that may arise when I decide to sell the property in the future.
The aforementioned property is a joint property owned by the husband and wife. After the wife's death, the property is inherited by her two children, one of whom is a minor of 15 years and the other is 21 years old, as well as the husband. The seller, who is the husband, is willing to include all the children as parties in the sale deed. However, since the children are currently studying, they would like their share to be paid to their father, and this arrangement will be mentioned in the sale deed.
Now, there are questions to consider:
1. Considering the schedule problem, do you recommend proceeding with the purchase of the site?
2. However, I am concerned about potential issues that may arise when I decide to sell the property in the future due to Property schedules.
3. Is it permissible to pay the entire amount to the father?
4. Can the complete TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) amount be paid to the father? According to my lawyer, although the entire amount can be paid to the father, the TDS amount must be paid to the respective PAN numbers, including the minor who needs to have a minor PAN. I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on this matter.
Asked 2 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu
I am writing to discuss the matter concerning the sale of the minor's share in the property. The seller has expressed their disagreement with the idea of seeking Court permission to proceed with the sale, primarily due to concerns regarding the Court's requirement to deposit the sale amount in a bank. Instead, the seller intends to reinvest the funds back into the property.
To better understand the situation, I kindly request clarification on the following points:
In general, does the Court typically allow sellers to utilize the sale proceeds for purposes other than depositing them in a bank? Is it mandatory to deposit the amount in a bank .
Are there any alternative solutions or workarounds that can address this issue without the need for seeking Court permission?
I would greatly appreciate your guidance and insights on these matters. Please let me know if there is any additional information or documentation required to further facilitate the discussion.
Asked 2 years ago