• Descendant claims share in divisions of land in which his Grandmother had a share in 1976

QUERY
Sole Agri land owner - Ramji Sr. (GGFather)

Ramji had 2 children - Dagdu, Laxmi (GMother)
Whe Ramji died , thereafter- 7/12 was changed to include Dagdu & Laxmi as Sole heirs in 1976.

Using some underhand means, Dagdu managed to become sole heir, removing Laxmi's name from 7/12 of the lans once owned by Ramji Sr.

After Dagdu died, his 3 sons & 1 daughter became heirs to the lands owned by Ramji Sr.

- the 3 sons & 1 daughter, in turn sold some parts of their agri land to outsiders & some parts were inherited by their children

- in total there are presently 54 land-owners of land which was in possession of Dagdu (& Laxmi, after death of Ramji Sr (original owner) )

In dec 2022, GrandSon of Laxmi , Namdev (GS) , has filed a case in Rural court in Pune dist, against all 54 owners, both heirs & outsiders demanding his share

Myself , bought 1 Acre of land from Ramji Jr, one of 3 sons of Dagdu. in 2012. All formalities for ownership , including inclusion of name in 7/12 were completed in 2012. Title check was conducted and advertisement put in newspaper by my lawyer. At that time NO CLAIMS on our plot of 1 Acre or Ramji Jr's land came to the notice of Registration authorities.

?? What could be the outcome of the case in Dec 2022 for Myself & other 53 Respondents ?

- is case valid after such a big time gap

- what happens to holdings of heirs of Dagdu

- what happens to outsiders holding plots bought from sons & daughterd of Dagdu ?
Asked 3 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu

First answer received in 30 minutes.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

6 Answers

There is no limitation for filing partition suit.

Hence if Ramdev has filed a suit claiming  partition and separate possession of his share in the property, if he is entitled then the court may pass a judgment accordingly.

There are 54 defendants, hence the case may be dragged on for years together, so you can patiently wait and watch the developments. 

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
90028 Answers
2497 Consultations

Namdev's claim to a share of the land may be subject to prescription and applicable statutes of limitation. The heirs of Dagdu and the outsiders may retain their holdings if their titles are valid and they have not acted fraudulently.

Mohammed Mujeeb
Advocate, Hyderabad
19328 Answers
32 Consultations

laxmi had equal share in land 

 

2) land was fraudulently transferred in name of son excluding daughter 

 

3) court can set aside sale of land 

 

4) delay in filing suit has to be explained 

 

5) your remedy is against seller of land to recover your money with interest 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
99826 Answers
8148 Consultations

they have their holdings aa per their respective share holdings. They can seek the same through suit 

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
34545 Answers
249 Consultations

  1. In 1976, Dagdu and Laxmi were on 7/12.
  2. Name of Laxmi removed by Dagdu.
  3. After death of Dagdu his three sons and daughter inherited the property which also includes share of Laxmi. This is the claim of Namdev.
  4. Land purchased by you in 2012 from son of Namdev.

If Namdev succeeds…

  1. There will be notional partition of property between Dagdu and Laxmi. If all 54 purchasers can be accommodated in the share of Dagdu, they will be entitled to keep the property declaring their sale deeds as valid.
  2. If all cannot be accommodated in the share of Dagdu, sale deeds of those purchasing last will be cancelled up to half share of Dagdu. If your sale transaction within half share of Dagdu, you are safe.
  3. As Laxmi was on 7/12, there is presumption that she valid legal heir of Ramji.

Ravi Shinde
Advocate, Hyderabad
5134 Answers
42 Consultations

Dear client,  

Based on the information provided, it seems that the case filed by Namdev, the grandson of Laxmi, is a claim to a share of the agri land owned by Ramji Sr., and the case has been filed against all 54 owners, including the heirs and outsiders who have purchased land from the sons and daughter of Dagdu.

It is unclear what the nature of the claim is, whether it is a claim to a specific portion of the land or a share of the entire land. If the claim is to a specific portion of the land, it is possible that the court may order the partition of the land and allotment of the share to Namdev.

However, it is important to note that the sale of the 1 acre of land by Ramji Jr. to you in 2012 was completed with all the necessary formalities and title checks, and there were no claims on the land at that time. This means that you have a valid title to the land you have purchased, and it is unlikely that the court will order the cancellation of the sale or ask you to surrender the land.

Regarding the holdings of the heirs of Dagdu, it is unclear from the information provided whether they have a valid title to the land they inherited. If the transfer of ownership was done legally and with proper documentation, they may have a valid title to the land.

As for the outsiders who have purchased land from the sons and daughters of Dagdu, the validity of their titles will depend on whether the transfer of ownership was done legally and with proper documentation. If the transfer was done legally, they may have a valid title to the land they have purchased.

It is important to note that the outcome of the case will depend on the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by both parties. It would be advisable to consult with a lawyer who specializes in property law to understand the specific legal implications and options available in this case.

 

 

 

Anik Miu
Advocate, Bangalore
11020 Answers
125 Consultations

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer