• Queries on Partnership and Private Limited Company-Under Arbitration

We had a family dispute and the arbitration award declared that the partership deed created without us was Null &Void and the movable and immovables assets will have to be split equally. Same for the P Ltd co.There was an appeal and finally we have signed an MOU for the splitting of the assets which the court passed for execution.1)The banks are requesting for creating a new partnership deed with all the partners for execution on the Bank A/cs reason being the partnership deed created excluding us is dissolved, is this necessary or is the MOU with court order sufficient 2) If we are not made partners, will we be taxed on the receipt of the settlement funds from the partnership as legal heirs Note:Though dormant rents are coming 3) Regards the Pvt Ltd Co( Dormant): There are some funds lying in the bank and some property. 1) Which is the cheapest way to transfer the funds lying in the bank? We were told that the best way is to sell the property and pay capital gains and then liquidate the company, then the funds will not be taxed any further to the co or the shareholder 2nd option is to value the company as sell the shares outright.
Asked 3 years ago in Taxation

Ask a question and receive multiple answers in one hour.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

7 Answers

1. Partnership deed will be required. Since it will be on the basis of the partnership deed, the bank will operate the account. 

 

2. Please share a copy of the MoU for us to better understand the family arrangement. 

 

Regards 

Anilesh Tewari
Advocate, New Delhi
18103 Answers
377 Consultations

Is MOU registered 

 

2) if so no need for new partnership deed 

 

3) however no harm in executing fresh partnership deed 

 

4) best way to transfer funds is sell the property and pay capital gains and then liquidate the company 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
99826 Answers
8148 Consultations

The bank cannot demand to create a new partnership deed just for the purpose of execution especially when there is a court order in this regard.

If the bank is refusing to accept the execution order passed by the court then you can initiate contempt of court against bank provided the bank is a party to the concluded case.

If the bank is not a party to the case then you can reopen the case, implead the bank as a necessary party to the case, seek directions to the bank to settle the matter as per court order without insisting on its own ideas in this regard. 

If you are willing to sell the property on the company name itself, i.e., liquidation then the company has to bear the long terms capital gains taxes as applicable.

 

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
90028 Answers
2497 Consultations

1) bank should follow terms of MOU signed by parties and filed in court 

 

2) if any share is received form sale of property tjen you have to pay taxes on them 

 

3) bank should change the signatories based on MOU 

 

4) it is necessary to peruse MOU to advice 

 

5) sell land pay capital gains tax 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
99826 Answers
8148 Consultations

1. The court  fee paid in the court towards the MOU is not considered as stamp duty, the stamp duty has to be paid to the registrar office.

As far as the partnership firm is concerned it stands dissolved by an order of the court or an arbitrator. 

But on the basis of the MOU arrived between the partners and has got an approval you people are entitled to a share as mentioned therein hence the bank cannot insist you to reconstitute a new partnership firm or deed, the bank has to obey the court order if the bank is a party to the case before court.

2. The answer to your second question is available in the MOU itself, hence no opinion can be rendered beyond that.

3. The MOU has been recognised by court in its order and has passed an order to that effect hence the MOU shall be the base and guidelines in connection with all such further actions.

4. No comments

5. The second option is the one which is legally viable and valid.

 

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
90028 Answers
2497 Consultations

1. yes if same is not challenged and attained finality

2. yes its correct

3.yes

5.its better to do from company's side

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
34550 Answers
249 Consultations

Dear client I am sorry to hear that but in this case and MOU with the courts order is sufficient

Anik Miu
Advocate, Bangalore
11020 Answers
125 Consultations

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer