You can file a memo before court seeking to refer the matter for mediation before lok adalat.

If you would like for an out of court compromise settlement you can negotiate the terms with the opposite party privately.

The recorded conversations between you both are not admissible as primary evidence in court of law in case  it is backed out and he prefers to continue with the case. 

Send a letter regarding terms of settlement 

it should be marked as without prejudice

then wait for their response 

Hello, 

That can happen. Since you mentioned a civil dispute and not a criminal nature dispute. Even the courts are also in favour of amicable settlement. For that a response through an advocate on his letter head without prejudice can be sent to the opposite party. Even if they show it to the court that will not be admissible as per law. Hence, go ahead. 

In case you require my consultation. I can be contacted here or on 

https://g.page/r/CfmI4KgE0neOEA0

You can do it without prejudice and private conversation will not be admissible evidence

Before you begin the conversation, say you are negotiating with the opposite party purely on a 'without prejudice' basis and only with a view to reaching an amicable solution. You may also audio record or video record the proceedings as a precautionary measure. Additionally, let the transcript be signed by both parties.

Dear client, 

You can ensure that there is no recording taking place during the meeting, and that everything in the meeting is kept off record. You can also get the help of a lawyer during negotiation proceedings as well. 

Thank you. 

Sir, it is better you can refer the matter to the mediation so that you can settle the matter out side the Court and the conversations happened in the mediation will not be used as evidence against you.

- Legally , you can approach the Court where the matter is going on for a settlement and to send the matter for mediation. 

- However , if the matter is criminal and cognizable offence then even after settlement matter cannot be withdrawn by the opposite party, but you can approach the High court for quashing the case filed by the complainant. 

-  Civil cases can be settled easily after informing the court. 

- No, only email is not sufficient for proper proof of receiving the WS by the said court. Hence, you should send the same by post as well. 

Yes it's enough

Mention without prejudice in email 

it should suffice 

Yes, you can add the word 'without prejudice' in the proposed email correspondence/communication about this. 

That would protect your interests. 

Dear client, 

the email should be sufficient. 

Thank you

Yes, in all communications with your opposite party, including e-mails, WhatsApp chats, mention "ON A WITHOUT PREJUDICE BASIS" without fail.

That is not recommended. Without prejudice is preferable to be a legal document. So, as advised it shall be through legal notice.

Just orally telling that it was without 'prejudice ' cannot be legally enforceable. 

It should be in writing. 

One cannot interpret law to his whims. 

Yes you can but with every ca re ordinary and it's 4 digit code. 

I have surrendered the Islamic and other not as Islamic bond

During phone call you can inform the defendant that this is an offer of settlement without prejudice 

Yes, you may say that all your previous communications were also on a strictly 'without prejudice' basis. In the case of a telephonic conversations, say these words at the beginning, middle and at the end, and better record them.

Dear client, 

You may try to explain that the details of the phone conversations were on the basis of facts and not any prejudiced opinions.

Thank you. 

Dear client, 

You may try to explain that the details of the phone conversations were on the basis of facts and not any prejudiced opinions.

Thank you. 

- You can mention about the phone conversation ,and telephonically inform for the same.