The objection against clicking of pictures is not valid
Even CCTVs record the entry and exit of people in the society premises and the transcript is available with the society
If the objection was to be sustained then even CCTVs would be invading the right to privacy of an individual
It is settled law that when a person becomes a society member he loses his individuality to the society
The flat owner is known only through the society
Provided the society does not impose harsh conditions which invade someone's privacy, the subject objection is absolutely baseless
One person's privacy cannot prejudice the safety and security of several people occupying the society premises
Had the society been clicking pictures of the owner and his guest while in the flat of the owner, that would amount to infringement of owner's privacy
Here the pictures are being clicked in the common areas of the society and that too for security reasons
Thus the objection is totally unwarranted