there is remedy for every problem under law. A party has to invoke a proper remedy. You need to submit an application for production of documents by employer giving list of documents with details as to dates and description of documents. If  employer refuses to produce the documents he cannot use the documents sought against you. It will establish the conduct of employer and court will draw adverse inference against him.

An application for production can be filed under Order XI Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908

- As per law, an employer can terminate its employee , if found guilty of willful insubordination or disobedience; theft, fraud, or dishonesty; willful damage to or loss of employer’s goods; partaking of bribes or any illegal gratification; absence without leave for more than 10 days; habitual late attendance; disorderly behavior during working hours; or habitual negligence of work.

- Further, an employer cannot terminate an employee without giving the employee at least 30 days of notice or a salary in lieu of such notice. 

- Further, as per the Industrial Disputes Act, any such employee who has been employed for greater than a year can only be terminated after permission is granted by a suitable government office. Additionally, an employer must provide valid reason for termination and pay a severance amount that is equivalent to 15 days’ average salary for each year of uninterrupted employment.

- Hence, the said company cannot terminate your friend without giving him time for explanation .

- Your friend can send a legal notice for the same and thereby ask compensation from the company. 

- Further, if there is any case against him then a copy of the compliant /petition with the whole documents should  be delivered  to the other party legally. 

- If not received then your friend should move an application before the court for passing an order for the same. 

- Without getting the complete documents attached with the petition he should not proceed for evidence. 

When you have lawyer to appear on your behalf you cannot make application on your own 

2) you should start with your evidence and woukd be cross examined by defendant 

it is not advisable to appear in person 

you can change your lawyer if you so desire 

court can draw adverse inference if defendant fails to produce documents 

Dear Client, 

Yes, the management can be questioned before the court for defiance of court orders. Secondly, the plaintiff can defend his own case in a court of law. As the filing of vakalatnama is already done by your advocate, it is possible to submit prayer and take the case as the party wants following the procedural law. 

Thank you. 

- Yes, the plaintiff can himself pursue the case without having a formal degree of legal education . 

1. Reply to your third question, any person can fight his case in the Court there is no bar against a person fighting his own case. File an application under Section 32 of Advocates Act, 1962 seeking permission from court, you will get permission of Court.
2. Management will not be called to Court but where defendant fails to produce documents sought by Court, the suit will be decree in favor of plaintiff.
3. The will certainly guide you as you are appearing in person.

There's no necessity to insist on the documents to be produced by the defendant if he has not attached at least the photo copy of those documents which the defendant relies upon. 

If the defendant has filed the written statement then, once the court has framed the issues,  the plaintiff can proceed to begin the trial of the case. 

If the defendant has not filed the written statement then the plaintiff can put pressure on the court to serve the defendant exparte and pass judgment on the basis of plaintiff's evidence. 

If the lawyer is not cooperating or if his integrity is suspected,  you may abruptly change the lawyer instead suffering more due to the lawyer also. 

1. If the defendant has not obeyed the court order then you can start contempt proceedings against the defendant. 

2. The plaintiff can terminate the services of his lawyer and request the court to permit him to appear as party in person to prosecute his case by himself. 

3. Yes,  he can. 

1. Yes

2. Yes

3. Only his case he can file