In continuation to my query, have few more things to clarify...
In the permanent injunction suite filed by me:-
In the last date of hearing I.e. 18th march 2023 (Defendant's evidence) was to take place but it cud not as mentioned the reason in my previous query.. hence now defendant evidence date is on 20.05.2023 and meanwhile another suite of recovery, court hearing date is 25.04.2023.. hence to prove his stand in the recovery suite he has avoided his evidence on 18.03.2023, so that his statements are not contradictory? This is my analysation. advise that his statements of the evidence can affect the recovery suite ? That is the reason he avoided his evidence?
Also, according to my injunction suite, since it is dealer and owner issue and not a family property dispute, does it take more than 5 years and till date no solution..Pls clarify.
Also, the recovery suite filed by the defendant is for recovery of money mesne profit and possession of property as he is claiming he is the owner. Also asking for a stay so that third party interest is not created.
my question is since the final sale consideration is not done, can he claim the possession/ownership, by paying 20℅ of amount.?
In the registrar appointment receipt taken online by the defendant he has mentioned second party as some XYZ , hence a third-party interest he has already created by himself. According to them they were willing to make the payment that is the reason seek an appointment, but unfortunately the owner expired. Here my question is if the bayana agreement is in the name of first party (my late husband) second party is the actual defendant who is fighting and filing the case, and .Money transaction has been done from his account , in that case how the sales deed /property transfer can be executed in the XYZ name I.e. (first party my late husband and second party XYZ) furthermore I have the documentary proof that the stamp duty was obtained in the name of XYZ second party . to be cont'd
Asked 2 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu
and that too on less amount of sale consideration ...may be on 50% of sale value, Hence advise is this act legally valid..? Can the property be transferred this way..?
Also till date the filing of replication has not been done by the party in RECOVERY SUITE.. and the date of final argument is on 25.04.2023..If defendant is not filing or not appearing on this date then what repercussion? And if I avoid this date and don't appear then what repercussions ..?
Furthermore, the defendant's lawyer was only targeting my personal equation with.my husband and bringing matrimonial dispute verbally at the time of my evidence as well and even in the replication what he has submitted in lieu of the defendant's evidence (pending) is targeting me on personal level only and not saying anything about the property. Pls advise what stand to be taken on my part. Furthermore, they have not submitted any kind of evidentiary docs clarifying their stand reg the property.
As informed by my lawyer (thru way of defendant's lawyer) they can challenge and appeal in the high court. Hence can you pls guide on this as well.
Asked 2 years ago