(1) Any property possessed by a female Hindu, whether acquired before or after the commencement of this Act, shall be held by her as full owner thereof and not as a limited owner. Explanation.—In this sub-section, “property” includes both movable and immovable property acquired by a female Hindu by inheritance or devise, or at a partition, or in lieu of maintenance or arrears of maintenance, or by gift from any person, whether a relative or not, before, at or after her marriage, or by her own skill or exertion, or by purchase or by prescription, or in any other manner whatsoever, and also any such property held by her as stridhana immediately before the commencement of this Act.
The question of whether a particular property is the Stridhan or not is also dependent upon the source of acquisition of that particular property and the marital status of woman at the time of such acquisition. The gifts and bequests that are made from strangers to the women when she was maiden, married or widow is also her Stridhan.
The Supreme Court after observing the plight of an estranged woman laid down the difference between dowry and Stridhan in the case of Pratibha Rani V. Suraj Kumar[vi]. It held that the woman is the absolute owner of her Stridhan and she can use it the way she wants to. It also held that in ordinary circumstances, the husband will have no right or interest in the Stridhan nonetheless in times of extreme distress he can use that but has to restore it back when he is able to do so.
However invoking the provisions of law cited by you in the latest post, you may be justified with the claim made especially in respect of the properties left behind by the deceased women which may include the stridhan properties too.