From examining all the facts of your query I want to say that-
I can understand your mother’s problem in this regard. These cases are very common in various Courts of India and Supreme Court of India. I have dealt with such cases in Supreme Court. Large unpaid debts and continuing defaults by borrowers require the banks and financial institutions to initiate proceedings for recovery of dues against the principal borrowers as well as the guarantors under various legislations and forums, including the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 for enforcement of security against the guarantors and under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 before the Debt Recovery Tribunals for recovery of debt against the guarantors. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which came into force on December 1, 2016, as a consolidated legislation to deal with insolvent and bankrupt persons, both natural and artificial, is also assisting the financial institutions to initiate corporate debt resolution process against guarantors.
There are already many cases against M/S. Shriram Chits Ltd. in Supreme Court of India, Madras High Court, Andhra High Court, Karnataka High Court.
To my mind the concept of guarantee is governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1882 ("ICA"), where under the contract of guarantee puts an obligation on a surety to honour the promise of principal debtor by paying the principal debtor's present or future debt, provided to him by a creditor in case of default by the principal debtor. The liability of a guarantor is co-extensive with the liability of the principal debtor and can be invoked without exhausting the remedies against the principal debtor, unless otherwise provided in the contract (of guarantee), i.e. certain exceptions could be created at the time of execution of the contract of guarantee vis-a-vis the obligations of the guarantor. However, limited rights have been provided to the guarantor that may assist him in discharging him from his liabilities in his capacity as a guarantor/surety.
Even the RBI's circular dated September 9, 2014 issued with reference to the Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters DBOD.No.CID.BC.3/20.16.003/2014-15 dated July 1, 2014, clarified that when a payment default is made by the principal debtor, the bank is entitled to proceed against the guarantor/surety even without exhausting the remedies against the principal debtor. In case the said guarantor refuses to comply with the demand made by the creditor/bank, despite having sufficient means to make payment of the dues, such guarantor would also be treated as a 'wilful defaulter'.
Two options are available for your mother.
- In case where a guarantee has been obtained by means of misrepresentation made by the creditor or with his/her knowledge and consent, concerning a material part of the transaction, such a guarantee is invalid. In terms of Section 142 of Indian Contract Act any guarantee which has been obtained by means of misrepresentation made by the creditor, or with his knowledge and assent, concerning a material part of the transaction, is invalid.
- One additional ground that can be taken by the guarantor is that the guarantee was obtained by the creditor by means of keeping silence as to certain material circumstances and in such circumstances the guarantee can be challenged as invalid.
In the matter of Krishan Kumar vs. Syndicate bank & Ors. it was argued that the guarantor did not give any guarantee and had not signed any document undertaking to pay any money to the bank in the event of defendant no. 1 (principal borrower) failed to repay the same and the guarantor contended forgery by the bank manager. Court held that the finding of the trial court in holding the guarantor liable as much as the principal borrower was erroneous in light of the fact that the plaintiff bank had miserably failed to prove the authenticity of the guarantee forming the subject matter of the case.
Detailed discussion is required in such cases with complete facts.
You may contact my secretary to connect with me for clarification.
I hope you and your family are safe and healthy. Stay home and be safe during Covid-19.
Gopal Verma,
Advocate on Record & Amicus Curiae,
Supreme Court of India