Un executable condition imposed on seller - can he exit the registered agreement ?
Hi : As discussed, I had a Shop in a MHADA promoted society.
I sold the said shop to a buyer and had given possession immediately.
However, due to one condition imposed by MHADA, which the concerned society is supposed to fulfill, the said shop is not being transferred on the name of the buyer. Condition is : The society was supposed to have executed agreement to lease deed with mhada before 25 years, which the society is still unable to execute. The mhada is erroneously charging the society, change of use for the shops - irrespective of the fact that, the shops were constructed as shops since inception. unless, the society and mhada entered the said agreement, the society is claiming that they are not authorized to transfer any tenement.
Since at the time of the sale of the said shop, in the NOC, the society claimed that, they are about to get the said agreement eecuted with mhada, under the assumption that, within a few months, the matter of transfer would get sorted, we went ahead with the agreement registration. The buyer - as per a condition in the agreement , has retained Rs. 25 Lacs from my payout - which he will release only at the time of the society transferring the said unit on his name. ( on share certificate)
Thus, The buyer while having paid 75% of money (to me), is unable to get the shop on his name.
The society is not doing anything to solve the issue.
The MHADA is failing to enact what they were supposed to decades ago.
I have done ample of follow up with the society and MHADA - to no avail. Using RTI I have discovered that, MHADA demand is illegitimate. Further, after having complained to the Sub register of cooperatives
Its been six years, my money is stuck.
The buyer is having possession of the shop so he is reluctant to do anything at all and he is refusing to revoke the agreement mutually, although I am willing to pay him back whatever I received.
If I do not do anything, this staus quo will continue for decades, since apart from me, no one else is a victim.
The buyer is happy since his Rs. 25 lacs remained with him free of interest , already for six years.
I need to exit this registered agreement by paying the buyer whatever he paid to me already.
There is no clause in the agreement which has specifically given me right to revoke the agreement - although the buyer had taken a right to revoke the agreement if the shop does not get transferred on his name within one year.
Under the Indian contracts law, I hope there are provisions to salvage a victimized seller who is bound by a condition which is beyond his control.
Therefore, I request to know :
1. Can I , through court, demand the buyer to revoke the agreement ?
2. How long these kind of cases will typically run ? - since the buyer will fight against such cancellation with all his might.
3. Can I get possession of my shops as interim relief ?
Thanks
Asked 6 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu