Whether all properties and names on right of record are mandatory in partition suit
A partition suit is filed including only property and an interim application (under Exh 5) was also filed, against my brother. I have made a party to builder, to whom my brother sold the entire property. My interim applicant was rejected by TC but upheld by LAC and lastly substituted by HC, passing Mysterious order, hence knowing doors of SC, soon.
we have many properties in the district, some of them are known and some are unknown. Few people, somehow managed the "Talathi" and got recorded their names as tenants and there are some true tenants on some properties, on which, process of 32 G of Tenancy act have been completed. (I have come to know about the present position of these properties, which were not known to me.
Question : 1. whether I can including these properties
known to me ?
2. what about unknown properties.
3. Is it mandatory to include all names as a
party to partition suit pending before TC
present on 7x12 extracts or it should be
Limited upto my brother.
4. whether I can file once again an application
under exhibit 5 to restrain the all the parties
from creating third party interest.
5. In such situation, what will be the builder's
position, who purchased only one property
from my brother. in view of amended plaint
and new interim application under exh 5
Asked 6 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu
whether it is mandatory to include all parties (hair or third persons (who are already on record) - being all area is undivided) ?
Asked 6 years ago