1) Here mitigation lawyer can't force you to pay 25 lakhs rupees. If its not in your capacity from where you are going to pay her.

2) Net income means net income which you receive from company or organisation in your salary account after deduction whatsoever company is deducting in the salary slip. If you inform court that you have home loan running and that has mandate on so and so date its get auto minus plus your other expenses those who are dependable on you.

3) You have rights to get visitation rights to meet you daughter  once in 15 days whole day.

1. yes you can take the time to repay. No one can force you to pay. 

2. Deduction of the housing loan is not considered as the same is counted towards your investment. only the expenditure is subtracted.

3. If the mitigation lawyer is not helping you and is forcing things upon you then you may go ahead and contest the case. 

Regards 

An amount can only be paid when the judge decides that it should be paid and judges are reasonable when it comes to deciding the amount. He cannot force you to pay an amount which he knows you cannot pay.

The 1/3 rule is not a fixed rule. It depends upon the facts and circumstances of the case. Therefore all these expenses are to be considered which are essential and her expense is essential too. So she would be given what is left.

Regards 

The girl can meet you on weekends. 8 hours a month is nothing and should be appealed against.

You can offer to pay monthly maintenance instead of lumpsum alimony 

2)courts considers your net income after taxes , dependent’s in determining maintenance 

3) your loans are not considered 

4) court has awarded you visitation rights of 2 hours is once a week or so 

1. Unless and until you agree nobody can force you to make payment. So agree for mutual settlement only on such figure to which you can agree.

2. Housing loan applied for before your marriage is not be considered while fixing quantum of maintenance.

3. The time and frequency for visitation of the child depends on discretion of court and wish of the child. If you do not have much faith upon the present advocate then you can change him at any point of time.

no one can force you to make payment beyond your capacity, you can pay as per your genuine convenience

1/3 is not a fixed rule, 

“amount of MAINTENANCE/ALIMONY depends on various factors such as Living Standard, Financial Status, Properties held, assets, responsibilities, custody of children, expenses, etc"

 file an appeal against the visitation order, the time/duration will be enhanced

No. You can complaint to bar association if any force for compromise by lawyer.

Net salary is the amount of take-home pay remaining after all withholdings and deductions have been removed from a person's salary by employer.

Fsther is legal Guardian but custody order favours mother , you can file application for extension of visitation rights or partial custody 

there is no such law. you can oppose the said maintenance application even appeal the same if you find the same erroneous.The court has to consider the net income after deducting all the expenses and if wife is working then such maintenance should only be awarded for children if any

1. The lawyer or your wife cannot dictate any such terms, you can refuse to budge to any kind of pressure in this manner.

2. The court should be convinced about your liabilities  as mentioned above, then there are chances.

3. This is visitation rights, why dont you file a child custody case and seek full custody of your child?

nobody cannot force you to make such payment. 

If you having personal loan then it can be considered while calculating the maintenance. if you having home loan then it cannot considered. 

I would like to advise you about the remedy which will be more effective than any other and that is you can either move a writ petition in the nature of quo warranto Oru order modification in case if custody order has been passed by High Court or You can try contest the case for complete child custody with valid points.. 

Im not sure the precise need of the mitigation lawyer in a matrimonial situation.  Nevertheless, assuming he is acting like a mediator to settle disputes between you and your wife- 

1. He can not force you per se but what he has suggested is a very practical solution as matter cannot be kept pending for the 20 years that you may need to repay the loan.  There are other alternatives but they may not be very secure for your wife which is why he may be asking you to pay the amount upfront. 

2. Firstly the 1/3 ratio is not followed by all Courts.  Secondly, only standard deductions and dependants are considered. 

3. No, that is highly unreasonable.  You should put your foot down and insist on half of al vacations/ holidays as well as 2 weekends in a month.  Your daughter is not that young that she cannot manage without the mother.  Better to specify all details of access while drawing up Consent Terms.  Do not leave anything as per the wishes and convenience of the child. 

Dear Client 

1. The mitigation lawyer can't force you to pay rs 25 lakhs and he also can force you to buy a house for your ex wife. The only thing they can demand for house is rent for her accommodation.
2. The court will consider your necessary expenses while deciding the maintenance amount to your wife. These expenses include previous housing loans, parents maintenance but loan for luxuries like car are not considered while deciding maintenance.
3. Father have right to meet his daughter as and when he want and you should file an application under guardian and ward act for custody of your child it alternate relief of increasing the meeting time with your daughter.

1. As per the information mentioned in the present query, makes it clear that you have been asked to do something which in fact, Hon’ble court would also not asked or order you to comply.
2. Yes, when it is for the house to be bought then you should be given option to give the instalments accordingly.
3. And it is not that the father can only get few hours visiting right to his daughter, but he even can get the whole custody by citing some of the good ground for the same.