My mother purchased an agricultural land from a person dinesh in 1986 and converted it in residential later . In 1995 brothers of dinesh filed a case against the pieces of land which were adjacent. In 1999 the court declares the piece of land purchased by mother to be in my mother's possession only.
Dinesh died in 2007. In 2017 the son of dinesh filed a civil suite in the court saying that " HIS FATHER SOLD THAT PIECE OF LAND TO MY MOTHER,BUT SINCE SHE IS A GENERAL CASTE ,THE LAND BE GIVEN TO THEM !"
The civil case hasn't been submitted yet though the dates are going on(this is different matter as it is civil suit).
Later he filed an FIR saying that " THE REGISTRY IS BOGUS AND HIS FATHER WAS MENTALLY RETARDED !"
He arranged a bogus mentally retarded certificate from some where but I know his father was in healthy condition as he sold other lands back in 1990s.
Two GAWAAH of 1986 registry had written affidavit in our favour that regitry is authentic and happened before them and dinesh was not mentally retarded.
Now, in the FIR investigation,police is asking for fsl test... Of signature .We are ok with it... Provided it is fair . The way his son has made bogus certificate of his father being mental,I am a bit concerned. Moreover,in registry in that time in 1986 the buyer had no signature in registry but police is saying it must have sign of buyer but I have seen 20 such registry in which there was no sign of buyer which was normal those days.
My question is... Since his son is saying in civil suit that MY FATHER SOLD THE LAND BUT MY MOTHER IS GENERAL SO THAT PURCHASE SHOULD BE CANCELLED...
And in FIR he is saying that THE REGISTRY IS ITSELF BOGUS AND HIS FATHER NOT SOLD IT ...
These two statements are contradictory so can the FIR could be Quashed (cancelled) from high court ?
Asked 5 years ago in Criminal Law
Religion: Hindu