I come across such cases on a daily basis and find litigants and advocates alike labouring under a number of misapprehensions vis-a-vis concepts such as ancestral property, HUF creation, etc.
Over the past few decades, in judgement after judgement the Supreme Court has made it amply clear that things have undergone a tectonic shift on the ancestral-property front after the enactment of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and that ancestral property that devolves on people post-‘56 through rules of intestate sucession contained in Section 8 thereof ceases to be ancestral property—i.e., it becomes self-acquired property upon being inherited.
Post ‘56, any inheritor—who, to recapitulate, comes into property not as the Karta of his/her own HUF but as an individual—is free to deal with it as he or she pleases.
To answer your question, yes if a property is inherited under the Act the inheritor(s) get(s) given absolute rights over it.
The authorities on this are far too many to list here but you would do well to look up Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Kanpur vs. Chander Sen AIR 1986 SC 1753. The latest judgement on this score of any import is Uttam vs Saubhag Singh (2016) 4 SCC 68, and so you would do well to look it up as well.
Have a nice day!