You may approach High Court for appropriate relief:
The relevant judgment is as follows.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8313 of 2016
Petitioner :- Monu
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Yadav
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
The petitioner's father was Assistant Teacher in a Primary School, Naithla, Baghpat. It is stated that while he was on Lok Sabha General Election duty he died in harness on 11.5.2004. At the material time the petitioner was stated to be a minor as his date of birth is� 20.3.1990. The petitioner's mother made an application for appointment of the petitioner.
Previously, petitioner preferred a Writ Petition No. 41969 of 2009 (Monu v. State of U.P. & Another) before this Court for a direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground. The said writ petition was disposed of on 18.8.2009 with a direction to the respondents to consider the cause of the petitioner. It is stated that in compliance thereof the District Basic Education Officer sent a communication dated 28th September, 2010 to the Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad for appropriate order. A copy of the said communication has been brought on record as Annexure-10 to the writ petition. The Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad has forwarded the said document to the Special Secretary, Education Department-5, Lucknow. A copy of the said document has been brought on record as Annexure-14 to the writ petitin but it does not bear any date.
Admittedly, there is delay in making the application as per petitioner he was minor at that material time but in the matter of Basic Education there is no Statutory provisions for appointment on compassionate ground. The State Government has issued Government Order dated 4.9.2000 in continuance of the earlier Government Order dated 2.2.1996 providing that the benefit of the compassinate appointment shall also be given to the dependant of the teachers and employees in the Basic Schools and a detailed guidelines have been provided under the Government Order which has broadly adopted the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974.
Recently the matter of compassionate appointment� has been considered by the Full Bench in the case� of Shiv Kumar Dubey & others v. State of U.P. & others, 2014 (2) ADJ 312 (FB). The relevant part of the order of the Full Bench� reads as under:-
"(i) A provision for compassionate appointment is an exception to the principle that there must be an equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. The exception to be constitutionally valid has to be carefully structured and implemented in order to confine compassionate appointment to only those situations which subserve the basic object and purpose which is sought to be achieved;
(ii) There is no general or vested right to compassionate appointment. Compassionate appointment can be claimed only where a scheme or rules provide for such appointment. Where such a provision is made in an administrative scheme or statutory rules, compassionate appointment must fall strictly within the scheme or, as the case may be, the rules;
(iii) The object and purpose of providing compassionate appointment is to enable the dependent members of the family of a deceased employee to tide over the immediate financial crisis caused by the death of the bread-earner;
(iv) In determining as to whether the family is in financial crisis, all relevant aspects must be borne in mind including the income of the family; its liabilities, the terminal benefits received by the family; the age, dependency and marital status of its members, together with the income from any other sources of employment;
(v) Where a long lapse of time has occurred since the date of death of the deceased employee, the sense of immediacy for seeking compassionate appointment would cease to exist and this would be a relevant circumstance which must weigh with the authorities in determining as to whether a case for the grant of compassionate appointment has been made out;
(vi) Rule 5 mandates that ordinarily, an application for compassionate appointment must be made within five years of the date of death of the deceased employee. The power conferred by the first proviso is a discretion to relax the period in a case of undue hardship and for dealing with the case in a just and equitable manner;
(vii) The burden lies on the applicant, where there is a delay in making an application within the period of five years to establish a case on the basis of reasons and a justification supported by documentary and other evidence. It is for the State Government after considering all the facts to take an appropriate decision. The power to relax is in the nature of an exception and is conditioned by the existence of objective considerations to the satisfaction of the government;
(viii) Provisions for the grant of compassionate appointment do not constitute a reservation of a post in favour of a member of the family of the deceased employee. Hence, there is no general right which can be asserted to the effect that a member of the family who was a minor at the time of death would be entitled to claim compassionate appointment upon attaining majority. Where the rules provide for a period of time within which an application has to be made, the operation of the rule is not suspended during the minority of a member of the family."
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is� issued upon the first respondent to consider the cause of the petitioner� in the light of the law laid down by the Full Bench (supra) expeditiously� preferably within a period of four months. The petitioner may file a copy of the aforesaid communication of the Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad to the Special Secretary, Education Department-5, Lucknow alongwith the representation. The State Government may verify the said fact from the� Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad.�
With the aforesaid observations and order, writ petition is finally disposed of.
No order as to costs.
Order Date :- 24.2.2016