Interim maintenance given to wife
I (husband) have applied for divorce. Wife filed petition for interim maintenance. She is professionally qualified engineer (Bachelors in Information Technology). She used to work before marriage in a company. But quit just before marriage. After marriage, after 4 months, I helped her to get a job that paid her 10,000 per month. I did this because she complained that she was getting bored at home and also thought it will help us in managing our home better. Later we had our differences and her parents took her to their home saying she would return in a week or so. However she did not come back for 2 years. After the 6 months she had left , we started to think of filing divorce. Our relatives met their relatives. But no steps from their side. Eventually we filed for divorce. Finally one fine day their relatives came to our house and gave all sorts of assurances of her behaviour and asked us to give her one chance. So, we did take her back in our home (which turns out to be our biggest mistake). She was working in a different job which paid her 14k per month. Now, after she comes back to our house, she resigns from this job. Her reason given was I asked her to leave the job and sit at home (which is a lie). Sometime after about 7 months after she comes back home, we again file for divorce (as there was no improvement in her behaviour). She applies for interim maintainance and family court has passed order to give her 15k per month from the date of her application.
My monthly take home salary is 76K. I have a aged father to support. I have to pay home loan EMI of 36K and other expenses.
I personally find this order to be very biased. The reasons being: 1) She is professionally well qualified 2) She is capable of getting a job 3) She is living in the same house as me 4) She is eating the same food as me 5) I am paying all the bills of our home. 6) Nobody is stopping her from finding a job for herself. 7) We do not have any children
In her application she has mentioned that husband is not paying for her 'mobile bills, soap, ...' to which most of the court had laughed. So, she accepts that I am paying for everything else. So, I am not sure why the family court judge wants me to pay 15K per month to her. Can someone please help me understand this. I am still waiting for the order summary from the court, which might also explain the rationale behind this order. Also, I am thinking of appealing against this order in high court. Would this be a wise decision?
Asked 8 years ago in Family Law
Religion: Hindu
I got the order summary copy today. It states the following:
As the wife is living in the matrimonial house and also getting food for her subsistence, these need to be excluded while quantifying interim maintenance. Similarly the husband is paying an EMI of home loan of Rs 35,400 where his wife is living, so indirectly he is paying for his wife also. Same is the case with paying for TV, DTH, milk, telephone bill, gas bill, grocery etc. All these expenses are common expenses of a household and respondent (wife) is naturally beneficiary of all these expenses, so these aspects also taken into consideration while quantifying maintenance. Once it is said that her earning capacity is of Rs 10000 as on 15/12/2012, that amount also needs to be taken into consideration. So, if we consider those aspects, she need money for her personal expenses, which woman need to maintain her lifestyle, which she maintained prior to this dispute arose. So for that purpose an amount of Rs 15000 would be enough. It would take care the expenses of her personal hygiene, for her outing, for her clothes and other items.
In one of the many points judge says that: Even if we assume that the wife is highly qualified and was earning till, the petition was filed, her admitted income was in the range of Rs 10000 only. SO there is a huge difference between her salary and salary of husband. The salary of husband is 7 times more than salary of respondent. So, considering this she is definitely entitled for the lifestyle which her husband is enjoying, so the claim for interim maintenance can be accepted., despite the fact that the respondent is highly educated and had a past experience of service.
I think judge has got two facts wrong: 1) Her latest salary when she was working was Rs 14000 2) Judge has not considered the fact that she was working before I filed divorce petition.
Why don’t judges consider the fact that for a B.E. IT person the minimum salary range is around at least 30K if the person is willing to work. My wife does not want to work and earn that much.
Should I still appeal in High Court to reduce the interim maintenance amount of 15K or it will not be worth it?
Thanks,
Asked 8 years ago