1) no video recordings of court proceedings are permissible

2)Order XI, Rule14: It shall be lawful for the Court, at any time during the pendency of any suit, to order the production by any party thereto, upon oath of such of the documents in his possession or power, relating to any matter in question in such suit, as the Court shall think right; and the Court may deal with such documents, when produced, in such manner as shall appear just.This provisions specifically empowers the Court at any time during the pendencey of the suit to order the production by any party thereto, upon oath of such of the documents in his possession or power, relating to any matter in question in such suit.

3) the Supreme Court has held that even if a woman is disentitled to maintenance from her husband during the period of separation after deserting him, she will be entitled to it after divorce if she is unable to sustain herself.A woman after divorce becomes a destitute. If she cannot maintain herself or remains unmarried, the man who was once her husband continues to be under a statutory duty and obligation to provide maintenance to her."

1.If the party called in for evidence does not stay within the local jurisdiction of the court,you can apply for video conference for recording his evidence. It is permissible under law.

2. Under section 125 crpc it has been specifically provided that if the wife leaves her husband willingly she is not entitled to maintenance.

3.Giving threats is not enough reason to avoid maintenance.

4.Though making perjurious statements dent the case of the party making it, it is also not enough reason to avoid maintenance.

1. You do not have any right to claim the video recording of the cross examination.

2. Section 91 comes into play to produce a document.

3. Search out the judgments yourself.

The court proceedings cannot be video recorded.

If you want the witness to be hear or cross examined then you may have to do it as per the situation and provisions of law.

You can get the citations of your choice by browsing the internet or can contact your advocate on this.

Hello,

Yes. According to section 22 of HMA,1955 proceedings can be done under camera on the desired wish of the parties provided that it cannot be published or printed without the prior approval of the court.

2-section 31 of CPC summons to another party witness for producing documents in the court provided they cant be examined on oath.

Leading case of Supreme court is lachman utamchand kirpalani v meena AIR 1963 SC

karnataka high court recent case cited is R.Sureka D/O Ranganathan v G Jayakumar karnataka high court,2013.

Regards