it is necessary to peruse judgment of the court convicting you to 2 years imprisonment

2) yopu should file appeal against order of conviction seek stay

3) rely upon opinion of handwriting expert that material alteration has been done on the cheque

4) section 87 of negotiable instruments act

Section 87 determines the consequences of a material alteration as extracted below:

"87. Effect of material alteration --Any material alteration of a negotiable instrument renders the same void as against any one who is party thereto at the time of making such alteration and does not consent thereto, unless it was made in order to carry out the common intention of the original parties.

Hello,

1) You have a very good chance in appeal from what you have stated. These points have to be highlighted in the appeal.

2) Get the certified copy of the order from the city in Jalandhar and ask the details of the proceedings including all papers filed by the complainant and let the lawyer prepare the Appeal. In my opinion you have a fair chance to be acquitted.

In appeal raise grounds mentioned by you that no orders were placed nor good delivered to you

1. Since you have been convicted by the trial court you can assail the conviction through an appeal. On your appeal the appeals court can set aside the order of the lower court.

2. You have to challenge the findings of the trial court on the issue of handwriting expert and prove that material alterations were done on the cheque, a fact ignored by the trial court.

You have failed to contest the case properly. The evidences in your support were not convincingly expressed before court while challenging the case.

The handwriting experts opinion should have been given more insistence.

You can challenge the judgment by preferring an appeal before the appellate court on the basis of your evidences and the points that were left out or omitted by court while deciding the case.

1. But as we saying we never buy goods no sign on bills of my receiving

2. as we changed nature of business also since 2011

3. as my Vat returns also not having any such bills

4. he showed only 2014-15 bills only, as he not showed bills of 2013-14 in vat returns.

If you had discussed all these points in the trial court during defence, then you can highlight these things which were not considered by trial court in your appeal before the appellate court.