Is anticipatory bail required in case of 498A in Hyderabad?
Dear Learned Counsels,
a) My wife and I have been separated for 2 years now and have a 2 year old daughter. we all live in hyderabad.
b) we filed for mutual consent divorce in April and the second motion was in october which i did not attend.
c) My wife had complained in the CAW cell in march and i too came under pressure to heed to their demands and agreed for a mutual consent divorce.
d) My only grouse in the MOU was with respect to the child custody clause which i thought was unfair (visitation once a week, name change etc) and i tried to negotiate for more visitation and joint custody as we live in the same residential complex.
e) So owing to this my wife has filed a 498a against me and my parents.
f) The inspector has issued a 41(1) notice and has asked me to be present with my parents for the investigation at the CAW cell on saturday. The inspector and my in laws are known to each other. They are also well connected to the ex-DIG.
g) i have already filed a case for joint custody and have asked for interim visitation (meeting alternate days) couple of weeks back (which wife is still not aware)
My questions:
1) Will i get arrested? Is it necessary to obtain an anticipatory bail? (When i spoke to my lawyer he said it is not necessary, but everywhere on the net it mentions procuring an ACB is necessary)
2) Can i sign on the second motion agreeing to the adverse clause on child custody to escape 498a and then proceed normally with child custody case? will my agreement to the mutual consent will anyway hinder my now recently filed petition of asking more visits and possible joint custody?
Thanks in advance for your time and guidance.
Regards
Asked 7 years ago in Family Law
Religion: Hindu
Dear Sirs,
1) If 498 A is a bailable offence in AP, does it mean i wont be arrested if complied with the summons issued by the IO? But will i still require a bail?
2) When asked casually to the IO of CAW cell, he passingly said you and your family will be sent to the station. Could not decipher his sentence nor did i prod him more. Have been summoned tomorrow at 11 for giving my version for the claims mentioned.
regards
Asked 7 years ago